Election season is in full swing and it is uplifting to see many candidates for most positions — with the exception of village president. Having served as village trustee for over nine years and chairing the Plan Commission before that, I have some thoughts on public service that will guide my decision-making process prior to proudly casting my ballot.
1. You can’t run on transparency and tout preconceived positions at the same time (think pool, Albion, community center). Transparency means coming to the table ready to listen to the entire public conversation, fellow board members, and expert advice and only then come to a decision. It is possible to run on a set of values that reflect our community and guide decision-making.
2. Transparency depends on communication and every candidate should be able to articulate a plan for improved communication. Every elected position represents the entire village. How does one reflect the many conflicting points of view in our vibrant outspoken village — not just one’s own? At the same time, communication is a two-way street, and every voter needs to consider how they share their thoughts consistently with governing bodies and show a willingness to learn.
3. IGOV has gathered an impressive list of examples of intergovernmental cooperation and resource sharing. However, every candidate running should promise to coordinate across all taxing bodies any proposed tax increase, referendum or issuance of debt. They also should collectively advocate for changes to the state policies that are partially responsible for tax increases. Be wary of anyone who promises to lower your taxes. Experience will teach them why that is not possible.
4. Be equally wary of single-issue candidates or those with an ax to grind. The concerns that face our village are complex, solutions even more complex and all policy changes are both interrelated and more broadly consequential.
5. Stop asking voters what they want and start asking what they are willing to pay for. Collectively, across the taxing bodies, what are the priorities for the entire village, not just perceived priorities within each taxing body?
6. Serving on a board probably takes twice as long as one thinks it does. Candidates should have given some thought as to how they will prioritize demands on their time if elected and only make commitments to you that they can truly honor.
7. Look for candidates who are willing to take the time and learn from those who have been elected before them rather than rushing to make their mark. State and national politics have confirmed that all change truly is incremental and the chaos of rushing the process benefits no one.
Serving my community has been a pleasure, and I thank all the candidates for their commitment to Oak Park, their belief in democracy, and the courage to raise their voices.
Good luck!
Colette Lueck is an Oak Park village trustee.