I appreciate that the pool referendum did not pass, as I believe it may not have been necessary and could have resulted in inefficient spending. Additionally, there seems to be insufficient collaboration with OPRF High School regarding shared use of the indoor pool currently under construction. If the Park District of Oak Park (PDOP) aims to address community recreation needs as stated, it would be beneficial to further engage taxpayers in these decisions.
I would like to propose that PDOP consider expanding the number of dog parks throughout the village. Over the past 32 years, I have visited every park in Oak Park, both with and without my dogs, and frequently observe off-leash dogs. This situation can pose risks, as unleashed dogs may unintentionally cause discomfort or safety concerns for children, runners, those who are fearful of dogs, or other pets. Even well-trained dogs may behave unpredictably when startled or excited, placing responsibility on their owners.
From a safety perspective, additional dog parks would provide an appropriate space for residents and their pets, especially since the existing two designated areas do not serve those living in the north, southeast, and west central parts of the village. There appears to be adequate space at Mills Park, Lindberg Park, Taylor Park, and Longfellow Park to accommodate these needs, thereby improving accessibility for residents.
Investing in additional dog parks would likely address a significant community concern and ensure resources are directed toward enhancing public welfare.
Mark Schlosser
Oak Park