I attended the Jan. 22 information session on the pool referendum and left with two clear impressions: I was well informed by the park district staff and board, and I was concerned by the tone and attitudes expressed by some attendees.
Before going further, I want to be transparent that I plan to vote against the referendum. I share this to make clear that my concerns are not about disagreement over the outcome, but about how we engage with one another in the process.
Two things stood out: First, several attendees expressed deep skepticism about the park district’s use of survey data, particularly the number of respondents and the validity of the 2019 and 2023 surveys. A review of those surveys shows that they followed standard, widely accepted survey methodologies.
Second, some comments directed at park district staff and board members went beyond critical questioning and veered into disrespect, implying intentional deception, lack of preparation, or deliberate omission of information. While scrutiny of public decisions is essential, accusations made without evidence do little to advance understanding or trust.
Oak Park has a long tradition of civic engagement and thoughtful public discourse. It was disappointing to see that tradition strained in this setting. We can disagree, strongly, while still engaging in good faith and treating public servants and one another with respect.
I hope a strong share of eligible voters will participate in the March 17 primary election and make their voices heard on this and other local issues. Robust participation, paired with respectful dialogue, is what keeps our local democracy healthy.
Deborah Levine
Oak Park