Boy Scouts finally concur with District 97

By Ken Trainor
The Boy Scouts of America, last week, ended their policy of banning openly gay youth from the organization. According to the New York Times report, "The decision, which followed years of resistance and wrenching internal debate, was widely seen as a milestone for the Boy Scouts, a symbol of traditional America. More than 1,400 volunteer leaders from across the country voted, with more than 60 percent approving a measure that said no youth may be denied membership 'on the basis of sexual orientation or preference alone.'"
The Scouts, however, still do not allow openly gay adult leaders.
The news reminded us of the great scout controversy of late 2000, early 2001 when District 97 decided it could no longer serve as host facilities for scout troops because of their discriminatory stance against homosexuality. The controversy hit just as the great Tasty Dog controversy hit, which also coincided with contentious village elections.
That resulted in record-breaking numbers of letters to the editors and very expanded Viewpoints sections.
Twelve years later, the Boy Scouts have finally begun to recognize what Oak Parkers were saying all along.
Contact:
Email: ktrainor@wjinc.com
Love the Journal?
Become our partner in independent community journalism
Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and OakPark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?
On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.
No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.
Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.
Reader Comments
1 Comment - Add Your Comment
Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.
Facebook Connect
Answer Book 2019
To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here. |
Quick Links
Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest. | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Subscribe | Classified |
Multimedia | Contact us |
Submit Letter To The Editor | |
Place a Classified Ad |
Latest Comments
A factoid to remember in all this is this: Trustee...
By Corey Gimbel
Posted: January 23rd, 2021 11:58 AM
I want a binding referendum on the ballot that all...
By Marlene Leroy
Posted: January 23rd, 2021 10:49 AM
The problem here is not cynicism from the right....
By William Dwyer Jr.
Posted: January 23rd, 2021 10:24 AM
Chicago Sun Times story today about The Riverside...
By Brian Slowiak
Posted: January 23rd, 2021 10:05 AM
Haaaaa. So true! Way too many signs in Oak Park. They...
By Aaron Stigger
Posted: January 23rd, 2021 10:01 AM
Never have so many tears been shed by those trying...
By Tom MacMillan
Posted: January 22nd, 2021 11:45 PM
Guillermo using different words you wrote what my...
By Bill Maxwell
Posted: January 22nd, 2021 8:09 PM
So, when groups like Freedom to Thrive release a third...
By William Dwyer Jr.
Posted: January 22nd, 2021 7:08 PM
Kevin Peppard thank you for the update and the name...
By Bill Maxwell
Posted: January 22nd, 2021 6:36 PM
OPRF
Posted: May 29th, 2013 7:13 AM
Only kind of... The concept of accepting openly gay youth but continuing to actively engage a ban on gay adult leaders has a strong undertone of "Pray away the gay." As if the BSA are saying "Maybe if we give our youth strong, heterosexual role models, they'll realize that being straight is better." It almost seems worse than before, instead of just being against it, now they are trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist... I hope I'm wrong