Graduated taxes: read the language

Opinion: Letters To The Editor

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

I recommend that voters read the actual language of the proposed constitutional amendment before passing judgment on it. Everybody seems to assume that it only permits graduated rates similar to federal taxes (higher incomes taxed at higher rates).

In fact, nothing in the amendment language precludes inverse graduated rates (higher rates on lower incomes).

The legislature would never do that, you say? Tax breaks for billionaires are politically impossible? Dream on, all you taxpayers about to the plucked.

Bob Stigger

Oak Park

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and OakPark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

4 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Nick Polido  

Posted: September 25th, 2020 6:17 AM

https://www.chicagotribune.com/politics/ct-graduated-income-tax-stratton-20200924-toniakvjejhoteplsquw6pybim-story.html

Patrick Moroney  

Posted: September 23rd, 2020 10:36 PM

Listen to a conversation on this matter at commongroundoakpark.com

Nick A Binotti  

Posted: September 23rd, 2020 9:58 PM

Bob, you're on the right path regarding "actual language of the proposed constitutional amendment." But it's not the rates you should be worried about. The constitutional amendment removes the clause "at any one time there may be NO MORE THAN ONE SUCH TAX imposed by the State for State purposes on individuals." Why remove a clause that prevents the state from levying multiple taxes on income?

James Kebinger  

Posted: September 23rd, 2020 2:30 PM

Once again, the only arguments people against the graduated tax amendment have are based in fear.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments