Who is responsible?

Opinion: Columns

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Ken Trainor

Staff writer

Divide-and-Conquer Trump is largely responsible. Moscow Mitch McConnell and his Republican do-nothings are largely responsible. Those who blindly support the party of doing nothing are largely responsible. Those who always say it's too soon to politicize these mass shootings are largely responsible. Those who insist gun regulation won't work, even though statistics prove otherwise, are largely responsible. Those who say gun legislation won't prevent all mass shootings, therefore we shouldn't try are largely responsible. Those who say only good guys with guns can stop bad guys with guns are largely responsible. Those who profit from the virtually unlimited manufacture and proliferation of weapons are largely responsible. Those who promote gun rights without comparable gun responsibility are largely responsible. Those who promote violent video games and violent films are largely responsible. Those who suffer from an unnatural love of instruments of death are largely responsible.

Bloodshed stains many hands.

El Paso and Dayton (and Douglas Park in Chicago) — fresh in our memories, even as Gilroy, California and so many other national open wounds recede from memory. Over 30 new deaths, dozens newly wounded. Hundreds more loved ones traumatized, countless lives damaged.

Meanwhile, our poor excuse for a president pays pathetically inadequate lip service, then makes plans for his next mini-Nuremberg rally to whip his mindless followers into another hateful frenzy. He claims he isn't a racist while freely admitting that racial division is his most effective re-election strategy. He's right. It's his only chance. Get Americans to hate and fear one other and hope that more of his side will get out and vote with venom. That's all he's got. It's up to the rest of us to prove him wrong.

Myriad challenges face this nation, but that's not the problem. The problem is whatever prevents us from addressing those challenges, whatever prevents us from finding solutions. Moscow Mitch McConnell and his Republican fellow travelers are the problem. 

Ideas abound. Some will work more, some less, but we have to try them to find out. Moscow Mitch and the GOP, having no solutions and fearing the NRA and gun manufacturers, prevent almost every attempt to reduce gun violence. Some did vote to ban bump stocks after Las Vegas, which was mostly for political cover, but at least they proved there's a line some are willing to cross. 

But there's so much more: A unified, nationwide system of background checks, no loopholes for gun sales. Cracking down on "bad-apple" gun dealers. Banning the sale of military-style/assault-style weapons. Limiting ammunition magazines and banning high-capacity magazines (the Dayton shooter killed 9 and wounded 27 in less than a minute before police brought him down). Safe storage of guns at home and in vehicles. Preventing straw-buyers from purchasing weapons for those who shouldn't have them. Regulating and taxing ammunition. Firearm orders of protection/restraining orders to prevent domestic violence deaths and suicides. Lifting the federal ban on gun violence research. Requiring smart-gun technology so only the owner can fire his gun. Longer waiting periods after purchasing firearms. More mental health services, available and affordable, and more coordination between mental health professionals and law enforcement in "red flag" cases.

The gun promoters' only idea for reducing gun violence is more guns in more hands. It has been tried and it has failed. We know now it does not deter mass shootings. And good guys with guns are rarely, if ever, on hand to "protect" the vulnerable. More guns only make it easier for those who shouldn't have them to get them.

Republicans have failed the leadership test on every challenge this country faces. Failed utterly. If Americans want to see any improvement, the do-nothings must be voted out in 2020 and Democrats must be given a large enough governing majority to prove they can get results with common-sense measures to reduce gun violence — as well as making health care accessible and affordable to everyone, stopping and reversing the effects of climate change, and a host of other life-and-death issues that Republicans have not and never will address. 

If we don't vote the do-nothings out, then we are largely responsible, too.

To read more, I recommend E.J. Dionne's excellent column in the Washington Post ("On guns and white nationalism one side is right and one is wrong," Aug. 4) and the Chicago Sun-Times' hard-hitting editorial ("It's about the guns," Aug. 4).

And here's the statement issued by Chicago's Cardinal Cupich in the aftermath of El Paso and Dayton:

We reject the idea that living in America means risking being gunned down by a killer wielding an assault weapon designed for mass killing.

We refuse to become inured to the horrible idea that families must calculate the risk of violent death when considering how to spend a summer weekend.

We cannot tolerate a society in which parents have to wonder whether the child they dropped off in the morning will become another statistic or if their own lives will end that day in their place of work.

Mass shootings are not an inevitability. All human beings have the right to live without violence. To behave otherwise is to advance a lie. Stopping this lie begins with holding accountable our elected officials who have done nothing to address gun violence. Inaction only cements the idea that these tragedies are acceptable and that the weapons that enable them are simply common features of American life today.

But we also need to hold accountable those in society, including some leaders, who fuel these violent acts by dividing humanity through hateful rhetoric. This must stop — along with the silence of our elected officials who have failed to condemn hate speech, for they are the very ones who have sworn to keep our nation safe.

We know that together we can do something to stem the flow of blood. And we call on our elected officials to show us that they know it too.


Email: ktrainor@wjinc.com

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and OakPark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

2 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

William Dwyer Jr.  

Posted: August 9th, 2019 3:58 PM

Not that this will impact Ray Simpson's thought process one iota, but by a recent posting by Snopes.com is instructive for those who care about the truth. It calls the contention that "26 of 27 mass killers came from families" with no male presence false, inaccurate and outdated. "The number is most often shared via a link to an article on Real Clear Politics," Snopes states. "That article, however, is simply a blurb linking to a post on Patheos, which in turn cites heavily from an opinion piece by Suzanne Venker that was published on Fox News in February 2018. If we follow the trail a bit further, we arrive at a 2015 article in The Federalist about the impact fatherless homes may have on young men (and more specifically mass shooters)." Of course... Fox News, Ray Simpson's drug of choice. I'd note that the recent Dayton killer came from a family with both a father and a mother. The question people like Ray Simpson really need to ask is why is it that the vast majority of people committing these heinous acts- 98 or 99 percent- are male? And those nearly all white males. Why is that. That apparently doesn't that bother some white males. It certainly bothers this white man.

Ray Simpson  

Posted: August 9th, 2019 8:36 AM

How about those who refuse to enforce the 22,000 existing laws (Judges and prosecutors) be held more responsible than all the others put together. Are we so ignorant to believe that one new law will be the magic solution to a problem that is far more complex than Ken wants you to know. Failed families, churches, schools and politicians all need to stand up and admit their failures. 26 of the 27 mass murderers were from maternal families ( No male present) and many were subjected to behavior altering pharmaceuticals in grade school. This column goes out of its' way to demean and slander the President and his office. Mr Trainor is granted first amendment rights by our constitution and if he refuses to honor that right with "RESPONSIBILITY" Perhaps we need a federal editorial review board where every word he writes must be checked to assure that my feelings are not bruised or offended. I am sure he could find some value in our founding document if his rights were in jeopardy. Trying to solve a problem where you refuse to examine all of the factors is the height of ignorance. Blaming the 95+% of legal responsible gun owners for the actions of the 4% of people who are outside of our society shows how shallow your argument is. We, 96% will go along with your new mandates and those who create the mayhem will not give a rats pa toot!

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad