Petition circulates to remove Concordia regent

Alum group says online comments made by Eric Hiller are sexist, racist


Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Timothy Inklebarger

Staff Reporter

Walk the halls of Concordia University in River Forest and you might notice that women outnumber men by almost two to one.

At Concordia, the largest student demographic is female graduate students — in the fall 2018 semester, 57 percent of the school's undergrad enrollment and 68 percent of the graduate level students were women.

That might not sit well with one of the members of the Concordia Board of Regents, who is now under fire for comments he made online that critics say are sexist and racist.

An online petition to have Eric Arno Hiller removed from the board had received over 1,700 signatures by Monday, Aug. 12.

The petition was launched by Concordia University Chicago alumni after comments by Hiller surfaced where he, among other things, said that "a typical woman" should "carefully manage her priorities, or she will be swept along by the wicked zeitgeist that will encourage her to get more degrees and promotions and more responsibilities."

Hiller, who has worked as a product development expert at McKinsey & Company since 2015, according to his LinkedIn profile, did not respond to several attempts to reach him by phone and email. The next board of regents meetings are set for Sept. 20 and 21, and a petition is calling on the board to put the topic on its agenda.

In the conversation that took place between Hiller and several others on Facebook in November 2017, he said that degrees and promotions and responsibilities would "massively distract her from her primary priorities as a single Christian woman, including finding a husband (and all the prep and activities that goes with that), serving her family, supporting her friends, serving the Church, etc."

"That means she is going to have to, as much as possible, avoid jobs with lots of travel, jobs with excessive hours, promotions that are going to force her to work more, etc.," he added. "This will be DIAMETRICALLY opposed to what society, her bosses, her crypto-feminist friends and sadly, her father, are encouraging her to do."

The comment is one of several made by Hiller on Facebook over the last couple of years, which critics say should preclude him from his position on the board, where he has served since 2013.

In that same conversation, which took place on the Facebook profile of a friend of Hiller, the board of regents member also stated, "I can't speak for all men, but for most men, a girl with a great body is high on the list of things that says, this is a candidate."

"Moreover, the traditional Christian man will typically value women who overtly signal that being a great wife and mother are their priorities (and then family, friends, Church, etc.) but that career/education are just MEANS to the prioritized ends and should be made to serve those desired ends," Hiller wrote

In another exchange in March 2018, Hiller gives his thoughts on women in the military, stating: "Many people want to blame women and 'feminism' for [women in the military], and there is no doubt that they all suffer from the curse and Satanic desire to usurp male authority," he wrote. "There is no doubt any and all forms of feminism are, prima facia, evil."

In a third exchange that has surfaced for which no date has been determined, Hiller allegedly shares his thoughts on affirmative action, referring to Asian students as "Orientals," writing that the term "minority" is "a function of how incompetent and lazy a group is."

The group that has formed to remove Hiller from his position on the board created a Facebook group called Concerned CUC Family, which includes screenshots of the three separate exchanges between Hiller and others on Facebook.

Arif Negiz, who graduated from Concordia in 2011, said in a telephone interview that he and others believe that people like Hiller are taking the school in the wrong direction.

On his group's online petition on, Negiz and others said Hiller's comments are "sexist, racist, and do not reflect the values and Christian attitude expected from a leader at Concordia University."

Negiz tells Wednesday Journal that earlier this year the issue was brought to the attention of Rev. Daniel L. Gard, recently retired as university president, who took the offending online exchanges to the chair of the university's executive committee and Concordia Board of Regents, but no action was taken.

Madison Schulz, a former student body president who is a member of the group working to oust Hiller, said she is personally offended by his comments, stating: "What he's saying about women and Asian Americans is not OK and should not be allowed in the Lutheran Church or anywhere."

She said it is frustrating that Hiller serves on the board representing her interests and possibly hindering her professional career. "As a woman I'm frustrated, but as a human being I'm disgusted," she said.

Concordia alumnus Brian Becker, who serves on the Concordia University Foundation Board and has vocally supported removing Hiller, said it would take a two-thirds majority vote from the board of regents to get Hiller off the panel.

Recently appointed Concordia President Dr. Russell P. Dawn declined to discuss the controversy, but the president's office has released two statements on the topic — one on Aug. 8 and another on Aug. 12.

The Aug. 8 letter declined to directly address the controversy, stating: "We cannot speak directly to the comments made by a particular member of the University's Board of Regents, or to the surrounding controversy. We will, however, continue to celebrate the good work our Lord carries out every day among the men and women of Concordia University Chicago."

The Aug. 12 letter, however, took a more direct approach, following a number of letters to the school demanding action.

"I wish to make clear that Concordia-Chicago does not uphold ideas and statements that are derogatory to women or minorities," the letter states. "As our email stated last week, Concordia-Chicago does uphold the idea that each of us is blessed with inherent worth and equally valued regardless of background or demographic group."

Dawn notes in the letter that the decision is left to the board of regents, and the president's office has no authority to oust Hiller unilaterally. He adds that "Concordia-Chicago values women and men equally, independent of their physical appearance or marital status" and "celebrates the achievements and contributions of individuals from varied racial and ethnic backgrounds."

David Gillaspie, who graduated from Concordia in 2013 and is working to remove Hiller, said he hopes the petition and attention brought to the issue persuades the board to take action at its September board meeting.

Gillaspie said he knows that other members of the board, as well as faculty and staff at the university, are concerned about the issue.

"I'm afraid for the future of my alma mater," he said, noting that Hiller's views "don't reflect Lutheran values at all."

"In a position of leadership, he has no role in representing Concordia," he said.

* This story was updated to correct the number of votes needed to remove a member of the board of regents.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

8 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

William Dwyer Jr.  

Posted: August 17th, 2019 8:35 AM

Oh, it's very much about the Bible, Robert, and how people pick and choose to interpret it and hide behind it to denigrate the rights and humanity of half of God's creation.

Robert Reeves  

Posted: August 16th, 2019 7:46 PM

It never fails to blow my mind how the same minuscule group of people decide to snipe at each other on this site. The articles are generally of interest. The comments rarely reach anything approaching interesting. Sorry Bill, this isn't a discussion about the Bible. Many of us don't care. This isn't a discussion about the Bible. Its a broader topic where an average citizen can hear whats going on and decide that someone like Hiller probably shouldn't be on the governing body of a university that attracts more women than men with his very outdated mode of thinking.

William Dwyer Jr.  

Posted: August 15th, 2019 9:25 AM

Yeah, I have no problem with miracles, Kevin. I just think the important ones occur in individual people's hearts. The miracle of the loaves and fishes, in my humble opinion, is that those who brought food with them for the day long trek to and from the sermon, took what they needed and gave the rest to others, as Christ urged them to do. There was enough to feed everyone because everyone ate only what they needed and shared the rest.

Kevin Peppard  

Posted: August 15th, 2019 4:10 AM

@Bill Dwyer: I'm no Biblical scholar either, but I'll tell you who shared your thoughts on gleaning the good moral teachings of the New Testament. That was Thomas Jefferson. who was somewhat of a Deist/Unitarian, and took it upon himself to edit the four Gospels, via a literal snip-and-pasting from two Bibles he ordered from Philadelphia.. He removed all the miracles, so your Sermon on the Mount is there, but there are no fishes and loaves to feed the five thousand. No virgin birth, no Magi and Star of Bethlehem, no walking on water, no raising the dead, no making the blind see, no water into wine, etc. It starts with his birth, gives his ethical teachings and interactions with others, and ends with the Crucifixion, with no Resurrection.. He called it "The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazarus", commonly now known as "The Jefferson Bible". You can find it online for free as an e-book, readable on your PC or on the Cloud with various free e-reader software packages. He only let close friends see it during his lifetime, knowing he would be viewed as having insufferable arrogance for his project.. Get an edition where a prefacing writer gives Jefferson's thoughts on religions of the time. He believed that a straight forward exposition, without the abstractions of the book by St. Paul, would serve the purpose of instructing Native Americans.

William Dwyer Jr.  

Posted: August 14th, 2019 7:46 PM

I'm no biblical scholar by a long shot, but I have to ask- why was there any need for a "New Testament" if the first testament (the original Bible?) was supposedly all people needed? And is it possible there could be a third testament at some point? Me? I'll just stick to the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 25:31 and "Be still and know that I am." That's more than enough to keep a sinner busy without the added stress of assuming my Creator prefers one half of human kind over the other.

Kymberlyn Rosalind  

Posted: August 14th, 2019 7:18 PM

Wow! Just wow...where do I start? Petition signed!!

Brian Sharpe  

Posted: August 14th, 2019 5:46 PM

While we understand that Mr. Hiller's comments do not reflect the opinion of the entire Concordia organization; we must remember that they are still a reflection of the ancient dogma behind the university charter? Titus 2:4-5 And so train the young women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled. Ephesians 5:22-33 Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, ... 1 Timothy 2:11-15 Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. Yet she will be saved through childbearing?"if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control. Ephesians 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. 1 Corinthians 14:34 The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. 1 Peter 3:1-6 Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives, when they see your respectful and pure conduct. Do not let your adorning be external?"the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear?" but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the impe

Cherie Bussert  

Posted: August 14th, 2019 9:04 AM

As of Wed morning, August 14, that number has grown to 2137 signatures. Thank you for your accurate reporting.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments