Park district goes passive

Renovated Carroll Center marries history with state-of-the-art energy efficiency

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print
Show/Hide Gallery

By Lacey Sikora

Contributing Reporter

When the Park District of Oak Park decided to tackle a much-needed expansion of the Carroll Center, 1125 S. Kenilworth Ave., officials decided to think outside of the box. Way outside. 

They brought on local architect Tom Bassett-Dilley for a basic addition, but with the urging of their board and the help of a significant grant, the basic addition morphed into a one-of-a-kind passive energy addition and retrofit of the existing building.

Chris Lindgren, superintendent of parks and planning for the park district, notes that the project was driven by a growing need for childcare. 

"We've seen a large growth of children, particularly in south Oak Park," Lindgren said. "After-school care has been a big need. We've filled every site we have."

Lindgren says that rather than decommissioning Carroll Center, a move that at one point was seen as the best answer for the aging structure, the park district decided to expand it to help tackle the growing community need. 

The original Carroll Center, which was designed by noted architect John Van Bergen and dates to the 1920s, had been the recipient of a few additions over the years and was in need of updates.

"We went to build an addition but we didn't have a lot of money," Lindgren said. "It was basically going to be a box. We went to Tom [Bassett-Dilley] because he can make a box look great."

Before the project got underway, a park district board member asked what it would take to make the addition sustainable and put in a geothermal heating and cooling system. 

After meeting with Bassett-Dilley, the board was inspired to explore Passive House certification, a voluntary standard for energy efficiency in any building, not just homes, which reduces the building's ecological footprint and results in ultra-low energy use. 

Passive House construction is something Bassett-Dilley and his team are well acquainted with, having designed award-winning passive energy homes and buildings throughout the Midwest, including the park district's Austin Gardens Environmental Education Center. 

In general, Passive House methods don't come cheaply, but Bassett-Dilley was able to point the park district towards the Illinois Clean Energy Foundation's Zero Energy Grant process. The grant covered over $570,000 of the roughly $1.7 million total cost of the project.

"If you can get to net-zero, you can get a lot of costs covered," said Bassett-Dilley, who has seven certified Passive House projects and more that are pre-certified. "You have to demonstrate that the project is net-zero, and you have to get third party certification. One of those certifications is Passive House, and I've done a lot of those." 

He says that while having the new addition meet Passive House standards was all in a day's work, the trick was bringing the old parts of the building up to the strict energy-efficiency standards as well. 

The older parts of the building were cracked and not insulated, so making the building air-tight and insulated came first, followed by an energy-efficient air-handling system, lighting and appliances.

In a first for Bassett-Dilley's firm, at the park district's request they agreed to be the construction manager on the project. Timothy Eberline, a project manager with Tom Bassett-Dilley Architecture (TBDA), managed the project, and Lindgren, who has experience as a general contractor was able to aid in the construction process.

The finished addition includes a room with a movable partition that can be divided into two rooms for morning daycare needs and then opened up to become a larger space for after-school groups.  

Bassett-Dilley, says the project has been garnering a lot of attention both nationally and internationally, primarily because of the retrofit of the almost 100-year-old building.  It is the first Passive House Source Zero renovation project in Illinois and one of only a handful of zero-energy public buildings in the state.

Amy Henderson of TBDA points out that during current pandemic, the clean air standards of Passive House building can be a real positive (see tbdarchitects.com/2020/06/covid-19-focus-on-homes.)

"We've been focusing on healthy indoor air quality for a long time," Bassett-Dilley said. "Some of that is focused on healthier materials, and a good portion is the air quality the ventilation system requires. This is part of what's on peoples' minds as we look at going back into buildings together again. It's no guarantee, but at least it's a better situation."

The Carroll Center project also includes an impressive solar array, which Bassett-Dilley says is part of the big picture in reducing a building's carbon footprint. He credits new software that allowed his team to run an energy model during the design process, which helped maximize the efficiency before construction even began.

For Bassett-Dilley and his team, the project was a great way to combine two interests. "We love existing buildings and we know it's incredibly important to keep them and renovate them when we can," Bassett-Dilley said. "Tearing down a building and building new results in a huge carbon outflow. Retrofitting is incredibly important."

His team is working on the retrofitting of Frank Lloyd Wright's Oscar Balch House in Oak Park, and he says the challenge of adding geothermal and solar while maintaining the architectural integrity and the beauty of the home embodies the mission of his firm.

"It's easy to just go into the energy side, the easy side, but it's so important as architects to build buildings that people love, that fit their space," Bassett-Dilley said. "Buildings shouldn't just be efficient, they need to be loved."

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and OakPark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

6 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

William Dwyer Jr.  

Posted: July 27th, 2020 9:53 PM

I was one of the kids at the parks back then. And there were a lot of kids around. There were also only three TV networks, no cable. No internet, and much less organized sports. So what caused what here isn't at all clear, particularly as regards any "stewardship of tax dollars by the park district."

Les Golden  

Posted: July 27th, 2020 9:13 PM

In the 50s and 60s the population of OP was about 64,000, and signs heralded OP as The World's (Country's?) Largest Village. Each of the centers were manned during the summers by one college-aged boy and girl, and they supervised free activities such as ping-pong tournaments, softball games, arts and crafts, capture the flag, tether ball, four-square, Friday night teen dances, and on and on. From 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 pm the centers were the mecca for young kids. At that time the parks and recreation centers were run by the recreation department of the village. Today it is a separate taxing body with a full slate of bureaucrats. The centers are virtually empty and the fieldhouses are shuttered except for rental purposes. Make your own judgment about the stewardship of our tax dollars by the park district.

Tom MacMillan from Oak Park  

Posted: July 27th, 2020 6:14 PM

The town's population was 53,678 in 1990 and is 52,265 in 2018. So the so called large growth of children part of the story is totally made up, as population has has been steady for 30 years. I wish the Park District could just be straight with us, as they keep building facilities that are wonderful but provide free services that are not free. If they just said - we want to provide this and then let the citizens of the town vote on it, and the tax increase it comes with to staff it, people would have a choice. They keep doing these projects and they keep being afraid of ever letting the citizens decide on all of the spending. They have had a blank check for a really long time.

Helen Vogel  

Posted: July 27th, 2020 4:14 PM

Well done Tom, Chris and all. You have turned a run down community center into a state of the art facility. All involved should be extremely proud!-Poppy

Gary Cuneen  

Posted: July 26th, 2020 5:25 PM

The Park District of Oak Park continues to set a high bar. Thanks Jan Arnold, Chris Lindgren, Tom Bassett-Dilley, the board of PDOP, and other staff involved. And thanks to the IL Clean Energy Community Foundation for supporting this project. Appreciate everyone's leadership!

Sally Laurent-Muehleisen from Oak Park  

Posted: July 25th, 2020 2:58 PM

I was very disappointed to read the error in the signage placed outside the newly renovated Carroll Center. The sign, in part, reads "...315-Watt solar panels that generate 32,800 kilowatts of clean energy per year". There is no meaning to kilowatts "per" anything since a kilowatt is a unit of power (rate of energy flow), not of energy itself. The wording in the sign therefore makes as much sense as saying "I earn $15 per hour per day at my job". (The "per day" makes no sense, right?) Clearly the sign should read "32,800 kilowatt-HOURS of clean energy per year." (A kilowatt-hour is a unit of energy.) As a professor of physics, I regularly run a class designed to teach non-science majors - especially budding architects - some of the basic physics inherent in their fields. These students routinely make the same mistake of not understanding that kilowatts is already a rate of energy generation (or usage). It is unfortunate that misunderstanding is now written permanently outside one of our buildings. You might think this is coming from a "picky scientist" and maybe it is, but as Oak Parkers I think we all recognize the importance of science literacy in our ever increasingly technological world. We can - and should! - do better than to perpetuate common misunderstandings.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad