Oak Park funds township youth program

Decision comes after River Forest cuts funds for interventionists

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Timothy Inklebarger

Staff Reporter

The Oak Park Board of Trustees voted to continue funding Oak Park Township's Youth Interventionist Program, which provides services for at-risk youth.

The decision came after a debate at the board meeting on July 9, where trustees Dan Moroney and Deno Andrews argued that the township should add the $61,200 to its own tax levy, rather than have the village contribute.

Both trustees voiced their support for the program but said it should be the township's responsibility to fund it.

Andrews and Moroney voted against continuing funding the program, while the remaining trustees – Andrea Button, Jim Taglia, Simone Boutet, Bob Tucker and Mayor Anan Abu-Taleb – voted to continue funding the program.

Oak Park has contributed to the program for over 20 years. The program aims to provide counseling and other services to Oak Park and River Forest youth struggling with substance abuse and other issues.

"The Youth Interventionist Program, for me, clearly falls within the umbrella of the township," Moroney said.

He said that the township is in a better financial position than the village, with a pension program that is 95 percent funded and no debt. Moroney argued that the village is strapped with increasing pension costs for public safety workers, over which it has no control.

"Pension costs are decided by the state," he said. "That's part of the reason why our [police and fire] pensions are less than 50 percent funded, why we have over $110 million in debt, why our levy has gone up 23 percent in the past two years and why, as I've previously stated, our levy has gone up 160 percent since 1999."

Trustee Bob Tucker voiced his support for helping to fund the program.

"It's impactful. It's important. It's lasting work," Tucker said. "I have no intention to yank the rug out from this program at this point."

Village Attorney Paul Stephanides explained that the intergovernmental agreement with the township is for two years and includes a termination clause that can be put into effect on or before June 1, 2019, if trustees decide to cut funding for the program at a later date.

John Williams, who heads the program, said the service for youths is stronger when taxing bodies throughout the village contribute.

"I don't know if anyone has a child that has been involved in gangs, drugs or violence, but when they are you realize there is no such thing as too many resources to address it," he said. "If we do this by ourselves, we are not going to be effective. We need you."

Trustees who did vote in favor of continued funding requested more information from the township on the successes of the program.

"I hear that it's your position that there is an offset in costs, but it would be good to see that on paper and see some more metrics," said Trustee Andrea Button.

The debate comes only a few weeks after the village of River Forest cut $16,000 in funding for the program.

"We believe it's an established, mature program that's been going on for 23 years, and it clearly now should be taken over by the township itself and budgeted by the township," River Forest Village President Cathy Adduci said in late June.

"We also want to let the township run this program and not be burdened by another level of government oversight and government spending."

CONTACT: tim@oakpark.com

Reader Comments

2 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Dale Jones  

Posted: July 18th, 2018 5:10 PM

As a former President of the River Forest Park District in 2011, I fought an unsuccessfully to withdraw Park District Funding of the Youth Interventionist Program. Why? Because the River Forest Park District levies taxes for parks and recreation. Juvenile delinquency programs were not within our statutory responsibilities, they are within the responsibility of the Township. The intergovernmental agreement that has each taxing body kicking in for the program was put together 23 years ago on an emergency basis when it was determined that there was an urgent need to address a delinquency problem in the Villages. One of the former board members who was present at the YIP creation told me that the expectation was that the Township would take it over once they were able to establish the necessary ongoing funding. At the time I opposed the Park District approval of the IGA, I was told the RF Township along with the OP Township didn't have the necessary resources. I responded that the answer is the same as for any other taxing body, put it to a referendum and let the taxpayers decide. If it is worthwhile, and I believe that it is, they will approve it. It was my feeling at the time and it still is that boards of taxing bodies are not meeting their responsibilities to the tax payers if they don't spend the tax money they are entrusted with for the purpose for which it was levied.

Jim Major from Oak Park   

Posted: July 18th, 2018 12:49 PM

What's the cost of cutting programs like this? Extremely high I would say. Glad the board voted to fund it and hope communication is ongoing with OP Township to find ways to work together . Don't get divided and conquered. .

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2018

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2018 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments