A better model for decision-making

Opinion: Letters To The Editor

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

It will be very interesting to see how the board ducks and dodges around the Pleasant Street precedent when presented with the plan to build a Wright Home & Studio visitor and education center. Both cases involve demolition of structures in a historic district that are not, in and of themselves, architecturally significant. If Wright gets approved after Pleasant was denied, that's a lawsuit even I could probably win, and I wasn't a litigator. 

The test in my view should be not whether one can demolish a structure that is not in and of itself significant, but what sort of structure can one replace it with. That is how the board should have approached the Pleasant Street issue. That is also the right approach, in my opinion, from a public-interest perspective — let's promote the building of forward-thinking structures that the next generation will look back on with pride. 

The Wright plans, from what I have read, seem to fit that idea. It's entirely possible that the Pleasant Street plans would fit that idea too, but by all appearances the board never got to that question. They denied demolition without regard to the proposed replacement plan.

Bob Stigger

Oak Park

Reader Comments

No Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad