IDOT has tunnel, or canyon, vision when it comes to Oak Park

Opinion: Columns

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Tom DeCoursey

One View

I want to summarize a few highlights of the IDOT-Village Board meeting of June 11. On one hand, it was great to see the room packed with Oak Parkers, despite the lack of air conditioning. On the other, the two dozen villagers who spoke all lived within a few blocks of the Eisenhower.

I would like to remind north Oak Parkers — in fact, anyone who commutes on the Ike into Chicago — that the inbound Ike from Austin eastward will not be expanded. Just the corridor that brings cars from the western suburbs through Oak Park will be expanded. This means that inbound traffic from Oak Park to Chicago will be worse than ever, because the volume of eastbound vehicles will increase.

Bottom line: IDOT says they have progressed through earlier planning stages and have narrowed the options down to five, each of which includes adding a new lane to the Ike in each direction from Austin to Mannheim. It is a fundamental problem that the definition of "success" for IDOT is to increase the number of vehicles driving in and out of Chicago. There was no discussion by IDOT about the environmental impact of increasing vehicle traffic through Oak Park, but the answer is pretty obvious. Air quality will be degraded and noise pollution will be worse. Seriously, does Chicago really need more vehicle traffic? Where will these cars park? The private corporation that owns Chicago's extortionary parking meters must be thrilled by IDOT's philosophy.

IDOT generates bogus statistics to "prove" that we need more lanes on the Ike. For example, they say the Blue Line operates at only 58 percent capacity. This is a bad thing? Obviously the Blue Line is packed (SRO) at rush-hour, but sure, at 2 a.m. the cars are pretty empty. This is like saying the Eisenhower only operates at 40 percent capacity because you could squeeze a lot more cars onto the road, although they would not move very fast.

The most outrageous statistical fabrication of the evening was the claim that IDOT had considered Blue Line extension but concluded that this would not decrease traffic on the Eisenhower! I know a lot of people with nightmare commutes on the Ike who would be very glad to have the option of an extended Blue Line. Not to mention that the Blue Line from the west could bring tourists into Oak Park for Wright/Hemingway/sushi, etc.

It is clear that public mass transit is the solution. Unfortunately, there is no political will to solve this problem. Travel to any of hundreds of cities around the U.S. and the world, and you will see what good mass transit looks like, and how much better it is than massive traffic congestion. In Osaka, Japan, we took the underground to a sumo wrestling match then realized we had left the camera at the hotel. We "rushed" back to get it, taking a taxi, but soon realized that the train would have been much faster!

Make mass transit safe, fast, efficient, clean, and reasonably priced, and this will become the overwhelming choice.

Tom DeCoursey is an Oak Park resident who lives near the Eisenhower and commutes to Chicago for work.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

4 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Just Sayin'  

Posted: June 21st, 2012 8:30 AM

Exactly, Kyle.


Posted: June 20th, 2012 1:39 PM

"Effective mitigation starts at the beginning of the NEPA process, not at the end." So true! That's why people need to speak up they can't know what issues need to be dealt with unless they're on the table. Thanks, JS.

Just Sayin'  

Posted: June 20th, 2012 1:31 PM

Agencies are required to use all practicable means to restore and enhance the quality of the human environment. Mitigation, as defined in federal statute, goes like this: Avoid, Minimize, Repair/Restore, Reduce over time, Compensate. This ordered approach ("sequencing") involves understanding the affected environment and assessing transportation effects. Effective mitigation starts at the beginning of the NEPA process, not at the end. The NEPA process is well underway . . .

Just Sayin'  

Posted: June 20th, 2012 1:23 PM


Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad