Index income taxes to inflation

Opinion: Letters To The Editor

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

In Springfield, the wheels were set in motion to move Illinois from a flat to a graduated state income tax structure. This should come as no surprise as the marketing for a graduated income tax has been in full swing for months now. Under the jingoistic "Fair Tax" banner, the plan claims only people making above $250,000 would pay more in taxes and 97% would see no income tax increase ... in theory. In practice, it offers neither.

The graduated state income tax plan, as it stands today, would actually result in yearly tax hikes, in perpetuity, on nearly all taxpayers. Not just the top 3% of earners, but every worker, from McDonald's burger flippers to McDonald's CEO, each and every year. 

How is that possible?

Inflation. The legislation for a graduated state income tax does not include provisions to index the tax brackets against inflation. This means higher incomes can either bump a taxpayer into the next tax bracket (a phenomenon known as bracket creep) or push more of a taxpayer's income into the highest bracket for which they qualify, even if that higher income is merely keeping pace with inflation. When the legislature gets around to raising tax rates or creating new brackets, which the state could do at any time, it will only exacerbate the problem. No inflation indexing is like having an invisible tax hike every year that politicians don't have to vote on. It just happens naturally.

Think-tanks from the progressive Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy to the conservative Tax Foundation strongly recommend indexing income taxes for inflation to ensure the tax system treats people fairly from year to year. It's sound economic policy that, ironically, is already built into our current single-rate (flat) income tax structure. The majority of states with graduated taxes index their brackets to inflation, making Illinois an outlier, which is, coincidentally, one of the criticisms of our flat income tax. The federal personal income tax has dozens of provisions that are indexed to inflation. Why the state would neglect to provide inflation protection for working families, yet give public sector retirees compounded 3% inflation protection on their tax-exempt pensions, is anyone's guess.

Since we're about 18 months away from a vote, I assume there's time to remedy this and other major flaws in the current graduated tax plan. But unless inflation is completely addressed, citizens should vote a hard No on the graduated tax plan. It's the only fair thing to do.

Nick Binotti

Oak Park

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

6 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Michael Nevins  

Posted: May 14th, 2019 8:47 AM

I know that our local Springfield /Illinois elected officials frequently read thru these comments. Wouldn't this be a perfect opportunity for some/all of them to use this forum and inform us of their thoughts on this matter?

Tom MacMillan from Oak Park  

Posted: May 11th, 2019 7:12 AM

Anyone still thinking that this is how property taxes magically get lower, think again. The extra funds are going to pensions. So you get higher income taxes to go along with your higher property taxes. And when the Dems figure out they still need more money, they will lower the definition of "rich people" to those making $100k and above, who will be outnumbered and out voted.

Brian Slowiak  

Posted: May 9th, 2019 10:16 PM

Somebody please help me with this, this might compound the problem. Chicago Tribune reporting the State of Illinois took in 1.5 billion in extra taxes because the economy is doing well, and The Governor has not made any comment about buying down the debt or paying into pensions. Where will the new money end up?

Ramona Lopez  

Posted: May 9th, 2019 9:03 PM

I agree Amanda. Once this passes our beloved elected officials in Springfield will be able to raise taxes on whomever they please as much as they want without any limits. And to think people actually believe tax evasion expert Gov. Pritzker when he says only the rich will be effected.

Amanda Poppenk Massie from Oak park  

Posted: May 9th, 2019 4:47 PM

Well said. The facts are the facts. The marketing has only been playing to "the rich will pay more", which even with a "flat tax" the rich pay more. No mention of what will be done with the money brought in. It should go to underfunded pensions but they aren't saying where it will go. Why not. I don't trust the "just trust me" from ANY politician. Vote no the way it's written now.

Larry Skiver  

Posted: May 8th, 2019 4:10 PM

Vote no

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad