An offer for Mohr

Opinion: Editorials

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Editorial

Our Views

Every elected leader has some sort of tote board, an abiding goal, a to-do list that they measure themselves against, about which they tout each success along the way. For Oak Park's mayor, Anan Abu-Taleb, that goal has been reducing — ultimately eliminating — the number of square feet of real estate that the village government haphazardly accumulated over past decades. 

Coming into office six years ago to a municipal government under substantial financial strain and rising taxpayer upset over perpetually rising property taxes, Abu-Taleb saw village-owned parcels large and small, from downtown Oak Park to Madison Street, to odd lots on North Avenue as lost opportunity.

With the great benefit of a roaring economy and deft moves in his "Oak Park is open for business" mantra, Abu-Taleb and the village board steadily off-loaded that inventory. Like the tall buildings or not, three of the four high-rises downtown are built on land fully or partially owned by Oak Park taxpayers. New townhouses at Madison and Home are on land packaged by the village government. When Pete's invests in a second Oak Park store at Madison and Oak Park Avenue, it will be on village land. Both the townhouse and the Pete's project were amped up by recent and strategic purchases of land — a Car-X and the original Robinson's Ribs location — by the village to expand the footprint of the parcels.

So when, a while back, Abu-Taleb called to trumpet that, in looking at his tote board, all the village-banked land had been or was about to be sold off, he was a rightfully proud mayor. Which led us to ask, perhaps with a leading question, if this meant the village government was swearing off ever buying land again.

He gave us the right answer. No. Under the right circumstances village government might buy a piece of land in order to control the development, speed an environmental clean-up, pair-up with a developer who owns other contiguous parcels.

This comes up based on our reporting last week that the village made a substantial offer of $4.4 million for the decrepit Mohr Concrete property at Harlem and the Ike. That offer was rejected as too low. Now on the market with an asking price of $7 million we'll soon see if the village's offer was reasonable or not.

There are multiple arguments, pro and con, that can be made as to whether the village ought to buy this large piece of land. Won't current zoning allow the village to control the future development? How can the village make an offer without fully understanding the cost of what everyone assumes will be a notable environmental remediation? 

Fair questions. But, we'd argue, an unfair objection at this point is that village government doesn't know what the hell it is doing when it buys real estate. The successes of the past six years in effectively selling off its non-producing parcels prove to us that, in the right circumstance, Oak Park can be a strategic buyer, the best buyer. Time and the market will tell.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

1 Comment - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Tom MacMillan from Oak Park  

Posted: May 8th, 2019 11:11 AM

The best buyer will be a private entity, not the village. Let the current owner and the future owner "understand" between them the actual total cost of environmental remediation and take care of that between them. The Village's roll is simply to make sure it gets done to our satisfaction. No need for the tax payers to eat that cost by charging in to it blindly.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad