SNAP out of it, Congress, the Farm Bill affects us

Opinion: Letters To The Editor

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

It's hard to make the Farm Bill sexy. It sounds bucolic and quaint — and far removed from our lives. But the lion's share of its funding goes to nutritional programs for Americans with low incomes, mainly SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or "food stamps"). Here at Oak Park-River Forest Food Pantry, over half the people we serve also use SNAP benefits. Yet they still need to come to us because those benefits are not sufficient to their need. Now some in Congress want to slash SNAP. 

Cutting SNAP means cutting our country's first line of defense against hunger — and charity can't fill the gap. Over 40 million low-income Americans — 1.8 million in Illinois — are able to put food on the table with the help of SNAP. Eligibility is indexed to income and you can only buy food with it. No diapers. No toilet-paper. No soap. SNAP is the single most effective method of hunger relief we have. It provides 12 meals for every one meal provided by all the food banks, food pantries, and soup kitchens across the country.

Think about that. I know you are generous, but can you afford to give 12 times the amount you already do to charity? 

SNAP is designed to help two kinds of people: those who can't protect themselves and those who need a helping hand to pull themselves up. More than 65% of SNAP recipients in Illinois are families with children, almost 30% are families with members who are elderly or have disabilities, and more than 43% already have jobs. And lest you think SNAP lulls people into dependency, do you know what the average length of stay on SNAP is? Nine months. 

Harmful changes to SNAP being proposed in the 2018 Farm Bill in the U.S. House of Representatives will cripple this vital lifeline. These changes would push large numbers of working families off SNAP, resulting in greater hunger and poverty. 

Please contact your local members of Congress today and urge them to vote against the proposed Farm Bill.

Michele Zurakowski

Executive director, OP-RF Food Pantry 

Reader Comments

4 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Neal Buer from Oak Park  

Posted: May 3rd, 2018 4:49 PM

I looked at what I bought the other day - onions, broccoli, mushrooms, rice, pineapple, and eggs. I don't like big government, but stores to feed the needy would be something I could support. As Ramona points out, it seems like real beneficiaries are the junk food companies. I could argue, that the SNAP program causes more damage to the health of the recipiants than it costs.

Ramona Lopez  

Posted: May 3rd, 2018 3:47 PM

Obesity has become a larger problem than starvation in the last decade. Perhaps too much gov't subsidized junk food? Not sure, but Coca Cola, Frito Lay, etc. all have lobbyists making sure the junk they produce is eligible under SNAP. In 2011, SNAP recipients spent over $357,000,000 on soft drinks.

Neal Buer from Oak Park  

Posted: May 3rd, 2018 2:39 PM

This is a symptom of a much greater problem. Why can't 17% of people in Illinois feed them selves? 2 million people in Illinois received $1,650 a year. Could the $3.3 billion be directed to get people off food assistance? This doesn't seem like the way to fix the problem.

Teresa Powell  

Posted: May 3rd, 2018 8:55 AM

Michelle, thanks for posting this important information!

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2018

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2018 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments