Pipeline Health found in violation of court order

The company faces a $200K a day fine if it doesn't restore Westlake Hospital services by Thursday, 9 a.m.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

During a hearing on Tuesday, a judge found Pipeline Health, the owner of Westlake Hospital and West Suburban Hospital, in contempt of court after they apparently violated a previous court order that prohibited them from closing the Melrose Park hospital.

Pipeline has until 9 a.m. Thursday to restore the hospital's services to the level they were at before April 9, when a judge ruled in favor of the village of Melrose Park's temporary restraining order against Pipeline. If Pipeline fails to restore those services, it can face a $200,000 a day fine.

Attorneys for the village of Melrose Park filed the temporary restraining order against the California-based company on April 8, after learning that it was planning to close the hospital much sooner than it had planned and before April 30, when the Illinois Health Facilities and Services Review Board is scheduled to make a decision on Pipeline's application to close the hospital.

Pipeline officials issued a statement on April 9, the morning that a judge upheld the temporary restraining order, announcing that they planned to temporarily suspend services at Westlake "due to concerns about its ability to continue maintaining a safe environment for patient care due primarily to declining staff rates." Pipeline also issued 60-day notices to Westlake employees.

Attorneys for Pipeline argued in court on Tuesday that the temporary suspension of services took effect on the morning of April 9, hours before the court order went into effect at 4:30 p.m. The timing, the company's attorneys argued, means that Pipeline was still in compliance.

Ari Scharg, an attorney representing Melrose Park, said that the temporary restraining order had no specific start time on April 9 and that, besides, Pipeline was manufacturing a crisis atmosphere at the hospital, including terminating employees and refusing patients, in order to hasten the hospital's closure before the review board could make a decision.

Scharg argued on April 9 that Pipeline was devising a plan to make it seem to the review board and the community that "the hospital is short-staffed and cannot safely care for its patients."

That narrative, Scharg argued, "is false — the reality is that Pipeline has fired numerous staff members and refused to hire any new employees to replace them."

The restraining order is in effect until May 1. Another court hearing is scheduled for May 1 at 2 p.m.

The April 9 court decision continues a fight started by local lawmakers and community leaders against Pipeline ever since the company announced in February that it planned on closing Westlake due to serious financial challenges — two weeks after it purchased the hospital, along with two others in Oak Park and Chicago, from Tenet Healthcare for $70 million.

Last month, the village of Melrose Park filed a lawsuit against Pipeline arguing that the company committed fraud and conspiracy by hiding its real intentions for Westlake from the review board and the community during the purchasing process.

In addition, state Reps. Emanuel "Chris" Welch (7th) and Kathleen Willis (77th) have introduced legislation that would allow the governor to overturn the review board's decision if the board allows Pipeline to close Westlake. That legislation recently passed the full House.

Pipeline has argued in a motion to dismiss Melrose Park's lawsuit that they did not hide their intentions for Westlake during the purchasing process and did not know the full scope of Westlake's financial straits before finalizing the purchase.

Reader Comments

3 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Brian Slowiak  

Posted: April 18th, 2019 10:47 PM

@ BK: Agreed. Unless Pipeline can show that the soundness of the hospital was in deed hidden from them. I know that Rep. Chris Walsh sits on the Westlake Board and The mayor of Melrose Park may be on the board. In my opinion, , that means to the insiders maybe practicing dooferism, job protection, which is the hidden legal graft legal corruption. Robo call from Walsh asking me to voice my concerns. Left message detailing points from above, and difficult to believe he or his staff have not called me back.

Bruce Kline  

Posted: April 18th, 2019 1:16 PM

Brian, there is little doubt in my mind that Pipeline (sounds like a company that services the oil and gas industry) was totally disingenuous when they claimed initially that they were going to maintain and improve Westlake. Otherwise, If they were not outright lying then, their problem is gross incompetence. Any attempt at due diligence would have shown that Westlake was in grave financial trouble. So either way Pipeline does not seem to be a high quality organization. But the real dilemma is that Westlake irrespective of the Pipeline fiasco, can not sustain itself as a free standing hospital. Any hospital - unless government supported - whether for profit or not-for-profit must be able to pay its bills (employees, suppliers, facility upkeep etc etc). So in this respect Westlake is between a rock and a hard place. And so is Melrose Park.

Brian Slowiak  

Posted: April 18th, 2019 12:09 PM

WGN is reporting that Pipeline wants to transfer the ownership of Westlake Hospital to the Village of Melrose Park. Naturally, Village of Melrose Park wants no part of this.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2018

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2018 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad