Toxic environment - and how we got there

One View

Opinion: Columns

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Show/Hide Gallery

Peggy McGrath

Editor's note: To celebrate the 50th anniversary of the publication of Rachel Carson's groundbreaking book, "Silent Spring," we are running essays to highlight the environmental challenges we still face.

Fifty years ago, Rachel Carson wrote, "I have made the suggestion that pesticide chemicals should be viewed with great suspicion as possible agents of genetic damage to man." Fifty years later, we are dealing with more chemicals than Carson could ever imagine.

How did this happen? According to the book Naturally Clean by Hollender, Davis and Doyle (2006):

"At first, no one questioned all this chemistry. In the post-World War II boom of the 1940s and '50s, chemicals and the products made from them were seen as the shining symbol of a modern new prosperity being built by American ingenuity. All across the country, natural was out and synthetic was in. In the kitchen, new time-saving frozen meals and instant just-add-water foods were the height of haute cuisine. In the garden, laborious weeding and bug-infested crops were replaced by a few quick sprays of the latest miracle weed killer or pesticide. ... From plastic wrap to spray wax, people marveled at the amazing wonders science seemed to be inventing every day, and the slogan of the DuPont Company, 'Better living through chemistry,' was adopted as the unofficial mantra of a grateful nation.

"The modern chemical revolution is a by-product of the petroleum revolution. Experimenting with crude oil, researchers discovered that the chains of hydrocarbon molecules it contained could easily be broken into segments (distilling) that could then be combined with other materials to create a dizzying array of new substances and materials. When this secret was revealed, the Petrochemical Age was born, and soon hundreds and then thousands of seemingly miraculous new products were making their way into American homes, each of them hiding any number of never-before-seen substances inside.

"Then in the early 1960s, the first ripple in the pond of progress appeared. A young marine biologist, Rachel Carson ... began investigating whether or not there were any ecological side effects being created by the widespread use of DDT and other chemicals.

"Today, there are an estimated 80,000 different chemical compounds being made and used around the world. Each year, the Environmental Protection Agency receives approval applications for another 2,000 more. That's more than five new chemicals being created every day. In the United States alone, some 500,000 chemical products are available to consumers, and according to various estimates, the average home contains anywhere from 3-10 gallons of these toxic substances.

"Astonishingly, less than 10 percent of these chemicals have been adequately evaluated for human and environmental safety. Of the 2,800 chemicals produced in or imported into the U.S. in amounts over one million tons per year, 43 percent lack even basic toxicity data, and only 7 percent have what was termed by the San Francisco Chronicle 'reasonably complete' data regarding their toxicity."

Rachel Carson was so right to fear the consequences of indiscriminate pesticide use. According to Naturally Clean:

"There is a wealth of emerging evidence that all this chemical use isn't good for us. Scientists are at last beginning to delve into the mysteries ... of these relatively new materials, and they're discovering that many of the things we've surrounded ourselves with are quite capable of causing disease.

"Our use of chemicals has skyrocketed in the last 50 years. We know that today we're making and using greater amounts and more different kinds of these synthetic compounds than at any other time in human history. We know that our bodies have been and continue to be contaminated by hundreds of these chemicals. (Hundreds of pollutants are found in each man, woman and child.) We know that many of these pollutants can cause serious problems.

"We also know that during the very same period of time that our use of chemicals has exploded, cancer has reached epidemic proportions, and asthma has crippled vast numbers of our children. We know that unusual hyper-allergic reactions have inexplicably developed among significant portions of the population."

The question is: What do we do about this?

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

7 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Kelly Porter Franklin from Nanaimo, BC, Canada  

Posted: March 7th, 2012 4:48 PM

I just want to thank the author. Good job! Not many people are speaking this truth (or doing it so well). Kelly Porter Franklin Agent Orange Researcher

Jim Bowman from Oak Park  

Posted: March 7th, 2012 4:31 PM

Oops, the question is, why is the Journal publishing as a One View what is nothing more than a long quote from a book someone just read? And a week after a legitimate One View by the same writer on the same subject!

Jim Bowman from Oak Park  

Posted: March 7th, 2012 3:51 PM

Carson downplayed DDT as malaria-eraser, among other mistakes and misrepresentations listed at the time by a U. of Wisconsin agricultural bacteriologist. She's a saint for many well-meaning people. But the '60s anti-war chant "LBJ, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?" could have been adapted as "Rachel, Rachel, how many pregnant women and children under the age of 5 died today of malaria, especially in no-spray zones in sub-Saharan Africa?" Doesn't quite sing but makes the point.


Posted: March 7th, 2012 10:48 AM

There is enough evidence to question the safety of some pesticides. William H. Gathercole is a biased individual who seems to want to demonize anyone offer alternatives to pesticides. His motives should be questioned.


Posted: March 7th, 2012 10:47 AM is an extremely biased organization that calls people who question pesticide truth terrorists. They even had an article on their site in Jan 2012 regarding Highland Park's ban on pesticide use. The title of the article is "Highland Park Pesticide Ban-An unrealistic Army of Weed-Picking Niggars Required-Dismal Failure of Prohibition."


Posted: March 7th, 2012 10:43 AM

Spinster? Oh my! Let's burn the book then! And the witch who wrote it! These regressive attacks on women are getting more and more laughable and outrageous.


Posted: March 6th, 2012 11:47 PM

It is MIS-GUIDED NONSENSE to VALIDATE Rachel Carson on this DREADFUL 50th Anniversary of her SUBVERSIVE book Silent Spring. Rachel Carson and the Removal of DDT Has Killed More People Than Hitler ! Carson was a U.S. zoologist, marine biologist, spinster, and cancer victim with NO recognized expertise, training or background in matters concerning pest control products.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad