What price diversity?

Opinion: Columns

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Mary Anne Mohanraj

Candidate One View

I'm frustrated by how frequently people at local forums use "diversity" when they're talking about higher property taxes. "If we raise property taxes, we'll be losing diversity!"

I want to unpack that a little because what they're actually saying is that if we raise taxes, we may lose a particular kind of economic diversity — specifically, people with working-class jobs may find it difficult to afford a house here. If people need to stay in an apartment in order to stay in Oak Park, they may decide to move somewhere they can afford a house instead, even if the schools there aren't as good.

Some small percentage of Oak Parkers may even be priced out of apartment rents — but those aren't generally the people complaining about raising property taxes at these meetings, and the solution for them is building and mandating a higher percentage of affordable rental housing. We also need more affordable housing for empty-nesters and seniors so that when they no longer need their house, there's an attractive option: condos near downtown, perhaps, so they can easily walk to all the amenities they've come to enjoy in their decades here — the parks, the libraries, the restaurants and shops.

Economic diversity doesn't necessarily map directly onto racial/ethnic diversity. It does in some ways, obviously, since African Americans and Latinos tend to have less wealth/income on average, given the history of structural inequities in America. But raising taxes is generally being done for a purpose — in the case of the current referendum, it's to keep the schools excellent. 

And there is absolutely an equity argument to be made that maintaining arts and languages and special ed and technology training and smaller class sizes at the schools is essential to ensuring racial and ethnicity diversity in our community long term.

The state's failure to meet its promised contributions to our schools, combined with the rising numbers of students coming to Oak Park schools, combined with the tax cap that means we must go to referendum to try to make up the missing money, have created a perfect storm. We're faced with hard choices — no matter what, some people will be hurt. All I ask is that people be aware of who, exactly, we're talking about when we discuss "diversity." If the schools are hard hit, it's the most marginalized who will suffer the most.

Let's not let "diversity" get slung around as a justification for demanding lower taxes. Let's not conflate racial and ethnic diversity with economic diversity — they're both valuable and worth considering, but they're not necessarily the same thing. 

If we want equity in our community, taxing at a level that is sufficient to provide those critical services in our schools is absolutely key.

Oak Park is a progressive bastion; we pride ourselves on being a beacon of diversity and justice on the hill. That means we can and must do better.

Mary Anne Mohanraj is a candidate for the Oak Park Library Board.

Reader Comments

2 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Bruce Kline  

Posted: March 22nd, 2017 12:05 PM

That's right Allyson we all have to tighten our belts - except of course for our bloated insatiable taxing bodies like D97. And for Ms Mohanj: throwing unlimited amounts of money at school districts does not apriori make them excellent. Sometimes the contrary occurs. It is time for a reevaluation and an accountability - not only at D97 but at D200 as well.

Allyson Thomson Olsen from Oak Park  

Posted: March 22nd, 2017 11:30 AM

So I'd like to add my two cents for age diversity. I've lived in Oak Park for almost 40 years. I was fortunate to be able to rear my son in Oak Park and he attended Oak Park schools. Friends my age and I are having to leave Oak Park now that our children are out of school because we can no longer afford the constantly increasing tax burden. I don't have an official count of how many tax increases I've voted for but it seems to me the schools usually get what they ask for. We've all had to do some (or a lot) of belt tightening. If a year of belt tightening can lead to a better plan going forward, I'm for it.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2018

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2018 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments