Residents express shock at Imagine price

Board cautions community against pitting facilities vs. equity

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Michael Romain

Staff Reporter

A crowd of at least 300 packed the South Cafeteria at Oak Park and River Forest High School on Oct. 30 to chime in on the preliminary long-term facilities plan drafted by Imagine OPRF.

The plan comprises a vast array of construction projects that could take up to a decade to complete and could cost nearly $220 million — a number that is only a rough estimate, since, as architects and Imagine members have repeatedly emphasized, it is hard to estimate construction-related costs for projects that are more than four or five years out.

That caveat, however, was not enough to calm the sticker shock that seized most of those in the room and was manifest in many of the roughly three dozen public comments.

Most people who voiced opposition to the plan brought up the village's already heavy tax burden and "America to Me," the documentary series that recently aired on Starz, for reasons why they didn't support the long-term facilities plan — framing an equity versus facilities debate that many District 200 board members insisted was not accurate.

Marty Bernstein, who said that he once coached a Little League baseball team that included Kendale McCoy, one of the subjects of the documentary, urged the board to "send the plan back to the architects" with instructions to remove the part that calls for demolishing the south end of campus.

"This plan is so expensive it's hard to imagine this board taking it seriously," Bernstein said.

Amanda Massey, echoing a familiar refrain among many opponents of the plan, said that the majority of the plan was focused on athletics.

"After watching 'America to Me,' it has become more obvious that this isn't what the community wants," she said.

Jack Powers, along with many other commenters, referenced rising taxes in Oak Park. A recent Taxing Bodies Efficiency Report presented to the Oak Park Village Board earlier this year showed that tax levels among all of the village's taxing bodies have increased by nearly 140 percent since 2000. Powers said that taxes on his small frame bungalow are about $16,000.

"Is this really where we want to put our money, with all of the other problems the school has?" Powers asked.

Those residents who spoke out in support of the plan cited the district's critical need for improving a campus with infrastructure that is inadequate and hazardous, particularly for special needs students, as a video that played during the town hall demonstrated.

"We finally have a board stepping up to its responsibility, and I commend them for that," said resident Deborah Wess.

"I wish people upset about taxes would direct that energy at the state level," West said, referencing the fact that state funds allocated to Oak Park school districts have decreased over the last several years.

Matt Kosterman, of River Forest, said that he "wholeheartedly endorses" the Imagine plan and challenged critics of the plan, namely the group OP-RF Pragmatic Solutions, to present an alternative plan.

"Where's the alternative plan?" Hosterman said, "you know, the one that gets the community [capital improvements to address long-neglected infrastructure] for free?"

"We need to be forward-thinking and imagine the future and what it can be," said resident Steven Schuler. "That's what this community has been about. I support this process and I'm in favor of putting [the decision to fund the plan] to the board."

There was at least one point of agreement among both supporters and critics of the plan — the idea of selling naming rights to buildings on campus in order to offset costs.

"I'd love the idea of naming rights," Schuler said. "I would be the first one to raise my hand to join a committee [on that]."

Board member Sara Dixon Spivy said that she was "a little concerned" about framing the plan as one that pits educational equity against facility needs.

"Those are not mutually exclusive," she said, adding that the master plan attempts to "address what the holistic needs of the school are."

This "is not a plan about just a pool," Spivy said.

She also tried tempering the passions of those who think that the plan is luxurious, promising those in the audience that taxes will not be spent on an extreme plan.

A draft of the Imagine group's master plan will be presented to the board on Nov. 15.

Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly spelled the names of Matt Kosterman and Deborah Wess. Wednesday Journal regrets the errors. 


Reader Comments

13 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Daniel Hurtado  

Posted: November 10th, 2018 9:29 AM

As to citing the America to Me documentary as evidence that Oak Park residents don't want OPRF to place a high priority on athletics, it seems to me that the documentary demonstrated what a positive impact school athletics can have on a student's self-esteem and future endeavors. E.g., as with Kendale McCoy.

Bruce Kline  

Posted: November 8th, 2018 9:35 PM

Nick, IMO the issue is not whether (or why) some districts passed a referendum and some districts did not. The crux of the matter, is that all of those districts cited, submitted their proposed future spending "wants" and "needs" to the people via referendum ... something D200 (and their IMAGINE mouthpieces) seem very reluctant to do.

Dion Ewald  

Posted: November 8th, 2018 7:42 PM

Nick, thank you for the bond detail clarification.

Dion Ewald  

Posted: November 8th, 2018 7:40 PM

I want to thank everyone that attended. I was called out to work at the last minute and had to miss it. Looking forward to the next meeting.

Monica Sheehan  

Posted: November 8th, 2018 7:06 PM

Marc, I agree with your assessment of the inflammatory comment. The initial news story contained a typo; it has since been corrected. Rather than Matt Hosterman, it was Matt Kosterman who made that comment at last week's Town Hall meeting. He was one of the two objectors of the Petition for the Referendum, and Kosterman, and other aquatic team parents, tried to keep the public-at-large from voting on the funding of D200's $37.5 million, Olympic-size pool in 2015. It's always helpful to know and consider the source of any comment to check it for inherent bias.

Nick A Binotti  

Posted: November 7th, 2018 4:52 PM

Bill - Elmhurst D205 did indeed pass their $166M referendum, but just like Harper College, they took advantage of an expiring bond. Elhmurst taxes were set to decrease $800 (on a $500K home) but instead will go up $150, pretty manageable considering the massive size of the bond. But this is the inherent danger of govt entities issuing bonds as when they expire, they are typically replaced with new bonds, creating an unending stream of debt.

Bill Dwyer  

Posted: November 7th, 2018 4:18 PM

Not arguing FOR that unGodly amount of money for D200, Nick. Just noting that some districts had huge bond issues approved. Hinsdale and Elmhurst did not.

Nick A Binotti  

Posted: November 7th, 2018 2:49 PM

Bill: 1) Maine Township has 3 high schools. 2) Harper College took advantage of an expiring bond, meaning even with this new bond, taxes remain at their current level instead of dropping slightly. Plus, their pro-referendum PAC collected $145,000, an obscene amount for a community college PAC, especially considering there was no organized opposition. All things considered, I'm amazed they only scored 61% of the vote.

Nick A Binotti  

Posted: November 7th, 2018 2:31 PM

So the Schulers, who made over $800,000 in political contributions in 2018 (see and, are in favor of punting the decision to the board? Maybe they can afford to, but we plebeians certainly cannot.

Bill Dwyer  

Posted: November 7th, 2018 1:34 PM

And Maine Township D207 voters approved a $195 million bond issue and Harper Community College saw a $180 million bond issue approved.

Brian Slowiak  

Posted: November 7th, 2018 12:39 AM

Looks like Hinsdale just voted down a high school improvement plan with a new pool which was going to set the tax payers back $166 million dollars.

Marc Martinez from Oak Park  

Posted: November 6th, 2018 10:04 PM

I found Mr. Hosterman's 'for free' comment particularly insulting and condescending. He attempts to characterize opponents of the plan as fools or na%uFFFDfs possessed by magical thinking. But I suppose that is more comforting than recognizing that opponents are concerned residents that would be willing to support spending on necessary improvements but not bloated vanity projects.

Alice Caputo  

Posted: November 6th, 2018 6:27 PM

$220 million naming rights for a high school pool in a town of 50,000 people is absurd. With all due respect, if this is the same Mr. Schuler who made over $1 billion combined selling his high frequency trading company and cannabis operation (bravo BTW), he really can't speak for most citizens who struggle to pay their real estate taxes.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2018

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2018 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad