Holding onto business

Opinion: Editorials

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

When we think about growing the economy in Oak Park, about the village being an active player in that effort, our minds go to luring a new business to town, and, further, we assume that it will be a retail business.

So it takes a short while to get used to the idea that Oak Park's village government is considering a proposal championed by the Oak Park Development Corporation to offer financial incentives to keep an existing business in town and that the business is an office use, not retail or a restaurant.

The business, so far unnamed but seemingly a marketing services firm, is reportedly locally owned and interested in keeping its headquarters here. But it is growing quickly, has outgrown its current facility in Downtown Oak Park, and is considering a move to a larger space at a lower cost per square foot than Oak Park's high tax environment allows.

The initial concept is that Oak Park would cover the interest on a loan taken out by the business to pay for furnishings and equipment for its new digs. The payout would be capped at $50,000 over a five-year period.

We're not opposed to this idea and we applaud OPDC for being on the front end of the discussions. But more than in most deals, this one will come down to the details worked out in the negotiations. Oak Park will need many protections.

Here are specifics we've heard mentioned in the past week: The business must stay here for at least five years. It must create a fixed number of new jobs at a specified salary point. The new space must have been vacant for two years. The work paid for by the loan cannot be leasehold improvements that enrich a landlord. There must be repayment guarantees if the business goes sideways over the five years.

In short, Oak Park needs both protection and also criteria that set clear precedents so that any insurance agent or newspaper office can't apply for funding. We need to be clear on what our goals are in making this investment. That said, we'd rather see Oak Park invest in specific businesses than in more fancy brickwork or assembling more property.

Reader Comments

2 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

OP Executive  

Posted: November 12th, 2013 7:34 PM

Real easy develop a strategy forst then tactical issues (i.e. TIF, marketing etc) - form a board like RF or hire super dynamic people like Berywn/form a Development Board. OP lacks cohesive and or/credible strategy.

John Butch Murtagh from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: November 12th, 2013 4:45 PM

I like the OPCD approach on the mystery business that is putting its cards on the table by saying, help me to expand or we will relocate. There are a lot of factors to consider and this case highlights a big one. Clearly, the village wants to support businesses that are progressive, and profitable. Successful businesses that expand innovatively increase their sales and profits through expansion are also expanding village taxing revenue. Increasing revenues for businesses and village is the ground that the village must hold. Business with poor performance, weak business plans; minimal reinvesting into their business should not be subsidized because other businesses were. Give them help, but not rewards!

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2018

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2018 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad