Out of the property business

Opinion: Editorials

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Editorial

Our Views

It is with deserved satisfaction that leaders of Oak Park's village government point out that all of the many parcels of land the village government had acquired over decades have now been returned to the tax rolls via new development.

We can restate 25 years of editorial positions that the village government grossly overpaid for virtually ever parcel it ever obtained. We can argue, again, that many of the purchases, especially along Lake Street in downtown Oak Park, were made willy-nilly without anything approaching a plan for redevelopment. 

Oak Park could be the poster city for why government is seldom the best option for acquiring property. Blame it on an Oak Park Economic Development Corporation that was in over its head for decades. Blame it on a deserved reputation among developers that Oak Park was about impossible to bring to the table to actually finalize any deal. Blame it on the economy. Blame it on the hubris of various village board members who, over many years, were certain they knew best what ought to be developed, how tall it should be, even what the building materials should be. That hubris is what begot the hideous Whiteco development (the building housing Trader Joe's) on Harlem Avenue.

We are less exercised than some that village government largely discounted and even gifted some of these prime parcels to developers in recent years. Sure, it would have been grand to get market price for our over-investment. But better to have secured solid developers and development and begin the flow of property tax and sales tax revenue to our various taxing bodies.

There are many lessons to learn from Oak Park's headlong rush into property acquisitions: Have a strategy. Have capable people overseeing the process. Have an exit timeline.

But for all our criticism over all these years, the lesson isn't that Oak Park should never again acquire property. We see blighted parcels along Roosevelt Road that could be assembled and repurposed. There could be a short-term advantage in village intervention at whatever happens next at the derelict Mohr Concrete plant on Harlem. 

We should celebrate the development that has finally been generated here without becoming fully gun-shy.

Reader Comments

3 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Tom MacMillan from Oak Park  

Posted: December 4th, 2018 10:14 AM

The problem has not been not having a strategy. It has been having too many strategies at the same time. The phrase -- too many cooks in the kitchen -- comes to mind when describing planning around here.

Neal Buer  

Posted: December 3rd, 2018 7:55 PM

The village needs to get out of the development business. Let Mohr sell their land through Loopnet. Let the purchasers of the land build something that conforms to current zoning. The village needs to get out of the way and let the free market operate freely.

Ray Simpson  

Posted: December 3rd, 2018 6:07 PM

"Gun-shy" is not a wise statement to make in this community. The Gun Responsibilities Advocates will get a half dozen columns from their members telling you what a virtue it is to be "gun shy"

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2018

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2018 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad