We do not have an informed electorate

Opinion: Columns

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

Tom DeCoursey

One view

'An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people." Although this famous quote, attributed to Thomas Jefferson, has never been found verbatim in his works, it accurately reflects his views [i]. Even in the Citizens United decision, the U.S. Supreme Court in 2010 declared, "In a republic where the people are sovereign, the ability of the citizenry to make informed choices among candidates for office is essential." Unfortunately, the court went on to twist reality in order to legalize bribery.

Does America have an informed electorate today? Is democracy safe? The failure of the Fair Tax Amendment provides a superb test case. This amendment would have enabled Illinois to join the large majority of states that have a graduated income tax. In the immediate future, passage of this amendment would have resulted in higher tax for those with incomes over $250,000 but no change or lower taxes for everyone else. Passage would have benefited 97 percent of the electorate. There are no cogent arguments against it.

How could half of Illinois vote against their own self-interest? The answer is: We do not have an informed electorate.

A few billionaires, in particular Kenneth Griffin (who invested around $50 million in a disinformation campaign), in combination with the owners of the Chicago Tribune, who published editorials and biased columns daily in the weeks before the election, were able to promote a false narrative and hoodwink Illinois voters.

Here are their main arguments:

1) Do not give Illinois lawmakers the power to raise your taxes.

This claim is ludicrous because they already have this power. Illinois tax rates have gone up and down because the legislature could always do this. The Fair Tax Amendment would have given them the power to raise taxes selectively on the rich. In most states and also in most countries of the world, taxing folks based on their ability to pay is considered fair. Those who have massive wealth can afford to pay a slightly higher proportion of their income so the less fortunate can survive.

2) The Fair Tax will not solve our fiscal problems overnight, so let's do nothing!

The Tribune published a long column written by "economists" who made this remarkable argument. While the authors admitted the Fair Tax Amendment would reduce the deficit by $3.4 billion, this would not quite cover our $5 billion deficit. Their conclusion was, let's not pay down the deficit; let's leave it at a huge number! Anyone who has borrowed money and cannot pay it back at all once should realize that paying part of it shows good faith and keeps one's kneecaps intact.

3) Ad hominem.

The richest man in Illinois, who will benefit mightily from the poor choice of Illinois voters, wrote a column attacking Governor Pritzker's fiscal dealings ("Billionaire Griffin slams Pritzker push for graduated income tax amendment" Chicago Tribune, Oct. 23). This is a classical ad hominem argument (attack the man). Pritzker's character or behavior is not on the ballot and are irrelevant. This is also called a "red herring" argument: you drag a dead fish across the path so the dogs (or duped taxpayers) will follow that trail and lose sight of the true villain who escapes.

4) If you raise taxes only on the rich, they will move to other states to avoid paying their share of taxes.

This is the only argument that has even remote credibility, making it a favorite of Tribune editors. However, because most states already have graduated income tax systems, any billionaires who want to flee have a limited set of options. Seven states have no income tax, including such garden spots as Wyoming, Alaska, and South Dakota. However, they may have higher property or sales taxes. Among the 11 states with flat taxes, six have higher rates than Illinois. State governments pay for things like schools, roads, bridges, children's health care, prisons, and they need money to do so. This can only come from taxpayers. You do not get something for nothing. The top tax rate in 29 states is higher than in Illinois [ii], so a rich person is far better off in Flat Tax Illinois than in most of the United States. If Ken Griffin wants to move to Wyoming and sell his hedge funds to the cowpokes there, he is free to do so.

The truth is that Illinois must raise taxes to cover its deficit. The Fair Tax Amendment gave Illinoisans the opportunity to shift the burden onto the wealthy, who can easily afford it without any loss of quality of life. Now, because they were lied to, Illinoisans have just voted to increase their own taxes.

This example proves beyond doubt that Americans are not adequately informed. Consequently, democracy is at risk. We are lied to during political campaigns, and this continues to happen because our legal system allows it.

[i] https://www.monticello.org/site/research-and-collections/educated-citizenry-vital-requisite-our-survival-free-people-spurious

[ii] https://taxfoundation.org/state-individual-income-tax-rates-and-brackets-for-2020

Tom DeCoursey is a longtime Oak Park resident.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and OakPark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

7 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Neal Buer from Oak Park  

Posted: November 29th, 2020 9:22 AM

I always have to laugh when some idiot opines that everyone else is uninformed. Rich! I would like to see the state trim expenses before asking for more money.

Greg Morgan from River Forest  

Posted: November 28th, 2020 9:29 PM

Tom DeCoursey, as I read the comments I realize that they are proof by example of the truth embodied in your thesis. They don't (won't, can't) understand the basic idea of a progressive income tax. I admit the alternative: they are simply money grubbing cheapskates who want to keep as much of whatever they get . Their top dollar is as valuable to them as the top dollar of a minimum wage earner is to theirs.

Robert Zeh  

Posted: November 19th, 2020 9:30 PM

The electorate wasn't uninformed. They realized that the Springfield politicians wanted something -- a progressive tax --- for nothing. No pension reform of any kind was offered. They could have paired the progressive tax with moving state workers to social security or 403b plans, or changing the state constitution to allow changes to pensions. To paraphrase a former governor, a progressive tax is a f* valuable thing -- you just don't give it away for nothing.

Ramona Lopez  

Posted: November 18th, 2020 10:15 PM

You are incorrect Mr. DeCoursey. We have a very well informed and educated citizenry. We have a lot of elected officials in Springfield who don't understand basic math. I'm no historian, but I'm sure Thomas Jefferson believed an educated electorate was a vital requisite as well. Just curious, why don't people like yourself and Ralph Martire just write a check to the Illinois Department of Revenue since you don't believe you pay enough in taxes? Please take the high road and demonstrate your high moral compass to us uneducated folk. Here is a link to another piece Mr. Decoursey wrote with the same disdain for people who don't think like him: https://www.oakpark.com/News/Articles/4-14-2015/You-have-to-pay-to-live-in-a-civilized-society/

Waldhorn Fafner  

Posted: November 18th, 2020 9:54 PM

Ok, where does this fit, give everyone a $250,000 deduction and remove all the write downs and deductions for the rich. Who is paying the taxes now? Ok, maybe make it only a $150,000 deduction.

Nick A Binotti  

Posted: November 18th, 2020 1:05 PM

Again, the most vocal proponents of the Fair Tax knew the least about how it actually worked. Thankfully, they know just enough to cast judgment on all those that opposed it.

Tom MacMillan from Oak Park  

Posted: November 18th, 2020 12:56 PM

You missed one argument. Three adults work full time. Adult A pays $10000 in flat tax on his $200k income. Adult B pays $5000 on his $100k income. Adult C pays $1000 on his $20k income. Somehow, with the existing flat tax, Adult A is already paying twice as much as Adult B and ten times as much as Adult C pays. Not very equal, but that is the system as it already works. I think everyone is very informed about how that works and voted accordingly.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments