Focus on the tax levies

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Dan Haley

Editor and Publisher

For the past several years I've been sending up flares about the pending arrival of several million dollars in added property taxes being spun out of the four new downtown Oak Park highrises.

Love them, hate them, doesn't matter. Vantage, The Emerson, Albion and Eleven33 are going to produce an additional $3 million-plus in local property taxes. Every year. Some estimate it will be closer to $4 million when the buildings hit full occupancy. 

New development on Madison Street including townhouses, a coming Pete's grocery store, new assisted living for seniors, will also boost the village's tax base. 

Couple the new development with the imminent end of Oak Park's two largest tax increment financing (TIF) districts – greater downtown Oak Park and Madison Street – and the moment of truth for Oak Park taxing bodies is upon us. 

Before the end of the year every taxing body will approve a new tax levy, which sets the pot of money they seek to collect next year from local taxpayers. 

Property tax hikes for non-home rule agencies, like school districts and park districts, under state tax caps are limited by the rate of inflation or 5 percent, whichever is less. But there are exceptions. Top among the exceptions is the ability of taxing bodies to tax the value of new growth coming into the village and to recoup dollars which over decades have been funneled into the village government controlled TIF buckets.

Put these two revenue streams into play and there is a lot of money -- millions of dollars – available.

It is a notable number. Maybe not a game-changer for the rest of local taxpayers who pine for their taxes to drop. That's not likely to happen. But this new money can help mitigate additional, unsustainable tax hikes if local taxing bodies don't just absorb the new money into their free-spending veins. 

That's the warning I've issued multiple times.

Right now is tax levy season. 

The library levy has already gone to the village board, which for odd, historical reasons tacks the library levy onto its own. 

So we know the library is asking for its traditional 3 percent hike but is also adding on almost $700,000 which previously had been diverted into the TIF fund.

Oak Park and River Forest High School is just out with its recommendation to the school board that it raise taxes under CPI by the 1.9 percent allowable this year. In addition, it adds all the equalized assessed valuation of property till now in the TIF and new growth (high rises and other new projects).

If approved by the full board on Nov. 21 it will reflect a levy increase of 7.75 percent and compute out to a $5 million increase in property taxes collected.

Still waiting to hear from the other taxing bodies on their plans for levy increases.

Both the library and OPRF are arguing that they need to claim this new property this year or potentially forego including it in subsequent years. I get that. Makes sense that after all the years of seeing tax dollars diverted into the TIF that every taxing body would want to benefit from the hard-won successes of the development work.

That said, claiming the new property does not necessitate taxing to the max. Ask for less total dollars and individual tax bills at least don't rise as much.

The argument made, so far, by both OPRF and the library that they are only taxing the same amount as the village diverted into the TIFs is weak tea. They are not obligated to continue that level of taxing. 

While taxing bodies have the right to benefit from an expanding tax base, so do taxpayers. That was the whole point of the TIFs, the major point of the highrises. 

In its presentation to the board, OPRF administrators argue that boosting revenues by $5 million a year will allow it to forestall the next tax referendum. 

There's a reason for tax referendums and it is to give taxpayers a say in how much money they shell out. Delaying that opportunity by taxing to the max right now is not the goal.

Email: Twitter: @OPEditor

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

2 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Kevin Peppard  

Posted: November 14th, 2019 2:42 PM

Dan: The various taxing bodies have not been deprived of anything. When they started to fall short, they went for referendums to make things up, increasing their levy base that way. Remember, the Downtown TIF lasted for more than the regular 23 years, since Oak Park took advantage of a special law passed for Kankakee to benefit George Ryan's hometown. Because special legislation is not allowed under the Illinois Constitution, it was couched in terms of what year and month a TIF was founded. What applied to Kankakee then also applied to Oak Park. D200 has had at least two referendums upping its levy base since the initial start of the Downtown TIF in the Seventies, and D97 has has also passed multiple referendums The Library has never been tax-capped, its levy being done for it by our uncapped home rule Village -- it always got what it asked for, and is in no fiscal straits. Their current money grab attempt is unwarranted. Furthermore, their financial projection shows that next year, when all the debt from building the new library and other projects is finally paid off, they want to continue taxing the year after, growing in perpetuity, a million dollars for debt that will no longer exist. They are governed by the Village under the Local Library Act, and the Village Board can stop this nonsense on December 2, when it will approve its overall levy. In the case of the Library, we have had the tail wagging the dog. D200 is still living off the largesse of its shady double-dipping on the last operating referendum, resulting in an enormous intergenerational transfer of wealth..The lack of understanding of this situation by the public, the various Trustees and even the Press is monumental. Only the Township has been clean, until it just passed its own money grab last night. It has been able to adjust since, it gets much of its money from grants and other governments. The previous commenter, Kitty Conklin, and I know how to zero in on this.

Kitty Conklin from Oak Park  

Posted: November 13th, 2019 6:27 AM

I hope this community supports one year of across the board tax increases tied only to the rate of inflation. Taxpayers have contributed mightily in past years to economic development through paying into and for the various TIFs. Give us a break, grow the governmental budgets at a reasonable rate and return newly allowed taxes to taxpayers.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad