River Forest residents for, and against, home rule get organized

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Devin Rose

Staff Reporter

One month before River Forest voters will have the chance to decide whether they want the village to become a home rule community, groups on both sides of the issue want their voices to be heard.

If the referendum passes on Nov. 6, River Forest would be granted all the authority that larger municipalities have — except what is specifically prohibited in the state constitution or statues. Communities with a population over 25,000 are automatically designated as home rule.

"It's the good-government way to go," said Dan Lauber, a River Forest zoning attorney who operates the pro-home rule website rfhomerule.info with residents Louis Vitullo and board Trustee Jim Winikates.

"Home rule gives local residents increased ability to find local solutions to local issues," Winikates wrote on the site. Instead of the limited powers the state provides for local municipalities, the village would be able to exercise a greater range of responsibilities, he said. That could include bringing in more revenue from employer head taxes on Dominican and Concordia universities, as well as gas, liquor and enhanced food and beverage taxes.

The site tells residents to "control our own destiny" and "vote 'yes' to bring River Forest into the 21st century."

But another organization has been formed in opposition to home rule, said resident Al Popowits, who has argued that home rule gives elected officials almost unlimited power to tax, spend and incur debt. He would not elaborate further on what the organization's plans are as the election approaches, but they have circulated pamphlets against home rule.

Next week, the River Forest Service Club will host a forum on home rule at Concordia University's Christopher Center. The forum will be held at 7:30 p.m. on Oct. 18, and the public is invited to hear and ask questions of speakers favoring and against the issue.

Meanwhile, Village Administrator Eric Palm has attended about 10 meetings of government bodies and organizations in River Forest to provide information about home rule.

Palm has said the educational materials he has passed around, which are also available online at www.river-forest.us/home-rule-referendum, answer some of the questions residents have had and provide facts about why the village is seeking to do it.

Overall, he said, "people were appreciative that we came," but he thinks the issue is challenging because it's a little more in-depth than a referendum for a tax increase. For the average resident, home rule might not be as easy to wrap your head around, Palm said.

Whether they vote yes or no, "we want people to be educated," he said.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and OakPark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

5 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Robyn from River Forest  

Posted: October 23rd, 2012 1:17 PM

I simply cannot understand why anyone would surrender their right as a citizen to vote on referendums? I will vote "no" on November 6 but I hope that the rest of River Forest residents are not unduly influenced by those serving on the Village Board.

John from RF  

Posted: October 11th, 2012 5:59 PM

This is Rigas swansong - and gift to those he hand picked to be his caretakers. He will do anything to go out as a tax and spend guy.

Kay from River Forest  

Posted: October 10th, 2012 9:17 PM

Reading info about Home Rule from the people who want Home Rule because they will then be able to Rule over all the other people who then will not be able to rule on tax increases etc.....? Doesn't make much sense to me. I will vote no


Posted: October 10th, 2012 7:19 PM

what a funny website...not a single fact to convince me to vote for home rule. I'm still voting no!

Marty from RF  

Posted: October 10th, 2012 5:54 AM

Jim W. should NOT be involved in any website or materials promoting home rule. Nor should Dan L. who is on a village board - appointed by the same person who is pushing home rule - Rigas. This shows - there is no need for it and no support for it, so it is being touted by two Rigas people. Oh, we are still waiting for solid reasons as to why HR is needed. Yet for since August all we here is, Trust us, trust us over Springfield?

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad