Turf field recommended for Ridgeland Common

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Devin Rose

Staff Reporter

The consultant charged with putting together a comprehensive field plan for the Park District of Oak Park has recommended installing synthetic turf at Ridgeland Common and at Irving School between now and 2015 at a cost of $400,000.

The recommendation came after Barbara Heller, of Heller and Heller Consulting, presented results of the field study, which will eventually lead to the creation of a master plan for the district's fields. Park staff have said it's meant to be a living document that the board can use long-term to assess the future of each field, keep track of participation numbers and event scheduling and determine the best maintenance practices.

The District 97 school board has already given preliminary approval to replace the blacktop at Irving next summer with an artificial soccer field, new playground and parking lot. They'll finalize that decision this spring. But the turf field option at Ridgeland Common is still up in the air as the park district waits on a grant and bid numbers for that renovation project and for the new gymnastics center.

During the meeting Monday night of the park board, the Park District Citizens Committee and the Greening Advisory Committee, Heller presented responses from focus groups about field management. She said park district employees thought artificial turf would be beneficial for all. But they said a priority system needs to be developed to control field use, and communication should be better about field allocation.

Affiliate groups agreed the fields are overused. Soccer has no limit on participant numbers and they should have a limit. The soccer fields also have too many weeds, not enough aeration and poor water, the affiliate groups said.

Heller and her colleague, Ed Dalton, recommended irrigation installation and improvements at Field, Longfellow and Taylor parks for $60,000 and turf blankets at Barrie and Taylor parks for $7,300. Dalton said turf blankets keep the fields warmer so the root systems can become more established and grow.

He said the district's soccer fields should be aerated weekly if they aren't too wet. Dalton also suggested weekly infield dragging for baseball and softball fields to prevent wild grasses from growing, and midseason field realignment if space allows. He said the goal of the park district should be to not use pesticides on the fields except as a last resort.

The district could instead utilize natural enemies to avoid pesticides. Heller said Dalton would come back with a training manual detailing the best field maintenance practices.

Longer-term recommendations, from 2016 to 2019, included laser grading for multipurpose and diamond fields at several parks, irrigation at several others and a synthetic turf field at Stevenson Park at a cost of $1 million. Stevenson was selected because it has lights, and there is already $900,000 allocated for improvements there in 2018.

Some attendees and board members said the numbers used to rank each field were hard to understand, and Heller said she and Dalton would take that into account while developing their final report. Heller said they hoped to present a final version to affiliate groups next month.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and OakPark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

7 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy


Posted: February 10th, 2013 4:48 PM

I hope that the people who want artificial turf are aware of all of the health hazards of fake grass, made up of polyethelyene and crumb rubber, pose to our children's health. Fake grass gets incredibly hot, can even get compacted causing more injuries, and infectious organisms can survive for more than 90 days. Not to mention all of the out gassing as the chemicals break down and leaching of toxins into the environment. Fake grass can also pose a lead hazard.


Posted: February 7th, 2013 12:53 PM

never have I seen people picnicing on the grass at Ridgeland. Just an fyi, the fields are not and should not be used as the dog park, though they are

Stephanie from Oak Park  

Posted: February 6th, 2013 1:13 PM

I hope the artificial turf doesn't happen. The common is used for more than soccer. People don't bring their kids over to the OPRF track to hang out and have picnics on the "green" there. Fields with real grass and "weeds" are ecosystems sustaining other creatures that are important for our health and well-being. We don't need more artificial anything. The thought of artificial turf is just so disturbing. Would also hate to lose the dog park and all of our wonderful friends we meet there.

OP Resident  

Posted: February 1st, 2013 9:10 AM

Adding turf at Ridgeland will mean that the sled hill - which is heavily used when there's snow or even for exercise - will be removed. The dog park plus will also go away as well, which uses the whole field. Nobody wants to use Maple Park's dog park. Why? It's too cramped and there's not enough room for the dogs to run around like they can on the field at Ridgeland. It'll also mean that the wonderful attendants that have monitored the dog park over the years will be unemployed.


Posted: January 31st, 2013 7:26 AM

Covering our parks in petroleum and lead is a great way to get out kids out to play. The infill used is toxic. Why doesn't this article mention that? Saving money on fields by compromising the health of our children is unacceptable!


Posted: January 30th, 2013 7:59 PM

Park district taxes on pd land. Why should our pd taxes go to dist 97. Turf for Ridgeland. Yes!

Where is the editor  

Posted: January 30th, 2013 7:22 AM

Does the $400,000 cost in the first paragraph refer to the study or 2 synthetic turf fields? Either way the sentence does not make any sense.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments