Refining and denying developments

Opinion: Editorials

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Editorial

There's a lot to be said for public hearing processes in Oak Park. January opened with two notable but medium-sized proposals heading to either the Plan Commission or the Zoning Board of Appeals. Both hearings were lengthy. Both rightly brought out a slew of immediate neighbors. And both ended with continuances as developers were sent back either to the proverbial drawing board or to gather more information. 

The plan commission heard a proposal to replace a decrepit commercial building at Madison and Gunderson with a super-sized apartment project. The eager developer overreached with a doubling of allowed-by-right units in the project — 48 vs. 24 units. Also concerning to neighbors and to us is the access to parking under the proposed building. The driveway would come off Gunderson, one of the narrower streets in the area. Not a reasonable plan, at least not at 48 units.

We agree with neighbors and, seemingly with plan commissioners, who criticized the proposed architectural design. Substandard. Not ambitious. Unacceptable. Hard to design buildings by commission or worse, by taking the advice of neighbors. A simple thumbs down and expectation of aiming higher should suffice.

All that said, we are on perpetual NIMBY alert and found the objection of one neighbor, complaining that apartment balconies would put their backyards into view, an inadequate objection. Once more, buy a house adjacent to a commercial strip and you give up some right to complain as commercial uses shift.

A compromise will be reached here. And the continuing transition of Madison Street from a commercial strip of obsolete buildings and uses into a residential hub is one of village government's true victories of recent years. The rezoning of Madison to allow this to flower, the bold expectation that, if the village consolidated its redevelopment efforts between East Avenue and Home, private developers would spread out from there is proving true.

Down Roosevelt way, a street that time has not improved, residents there turned out at a Zoning Board of Appeals hearing to largely but not completely object to a Taco Bell being pushed for the Oak Park intersection of Austin Boulevard and Roosevelt. Most recently an undistinguished but oversized bank branch, this parcel awaits new development.

Our friends at Taco Bell, forever remembered as the inventor of what obese America really doesn't need, the Fourth Meal, are going to get a complex if their effort to invade Oak Park is turned down again. But we hope they are turned down again.

Sitting at the crappy crossroads of Cicero, Chicago and Oak Park, we really need to aim higher than a Taco Bell. Everything about this sad intersection calls for reinvention. Fast food drive-thru is capitulation, not reinvention. Too many substandard bars and too many depressing liquor stores already line the Cicero contribution to this piece of God's green Earth.

Recall that neighbors on Madison rose up to block Taco Bell's introduction at the long vacant Madison and Lyman corner. So what has followed on that site? Currently under construction, a handsome apartment complex. That is what should go on the corner of Roosevelt and Austin. Let the bank company that still owns the corner pay the taxes and keep the weeds down. And let's be a little patient, a little hopeful, a little ambitious that better days are ahead for Roosevelt Road.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

3 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

William Dwyer Jr.  

Posted: January 22nd, 2020 7:26 PM

It's emblematic of today's shallow social dialogue that people like Tom McMillan respond to a detailed 560 word POV with sophomoric ad hominem. Haley was born and raised in Oak Park, lived there until he was in his 60s and runs a 40 year old business there. And Kevin? Mike Royko moved to Winnetka after his wife died. He couldn't even bear to sleep in their old bedroom, he slept on the couch, Several years after her death, he remarried, fathered a child and moved to Winnetka at his new wife's insistence. Just saying, for anyone who cares about the facts. So guys, Tom, Kevin, can you make any sort of valid arguments against the editorial's position. Other than childish arm farting and razzing?

Kevin Peppard  

Posted: January 22nd, 2020 5:43 PM

Tom Mac: I can make Dan Haley an Oak Parker again by letting him live in my unfinished basement, if he does my household chores. That includes windows. Kinda reminds me of Mike Royko, who opined about growing up living above a Chicago bar owned by his father, but when his syndicated column made it big, moved to Winnetka. Peter Finley Dunne he ain't.

Tom MacMillan from OAK PARK  

Posted: January 22nd, 2020 4:51 PM

Buy a house in Berwyn, and you give up some right to complain about how people live in Oak Park. Good advice for our local tax exempt paper's editor.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad