Deer-culling contract killed by River Forest board

Task force will be created to study the issue more thoroughly

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter


Contributing Reporter

Following nearly three hours of resident comment and village officials' discussion, the River Forest Village Board, Jan. 13, decided not to proceed with a plan to address deer overpopulation through a culling contract with the Forest Preserve District of Cook County.

Instead, the board agreed to create a resident task force to study the issue and make recommendations by Sept. 30. Trustee Patty Henek will lead the process of forming the task force. She hopes to have applications created and available online by the end of January.

Two trustees suggested models to follow, with Katie Brennan citing guidelines available through a Cornell University study and Respicio Vazquez recommending a similar task force effort in District 200. Vazquez acknowledged the D200 effort was "time-consuming." He also stressed the importance of having equal representation on the task force of residents advocating a deer-culling program and those opposed.

Henek noted the task force is likely to be ongoing, leading Trustee Erika Bachner to suggest the application include reference to a multi-year commitment.

Several trustees expressed hope for participation by Tim Preuss, urban deer project manager with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, who attended a village meeting in June on deer overpopulation affecting River Forest.

The path leading to the Jan. 13 actions was circuitous. 

Officials were originally set to vote on a deer-culling contract in November but when a large group of residents from both sides of the issue came out, the board agreed to suspend the vote. 

While they agreed to form the task force, they postponed the discussion of any specifics until a later date.

At the time, it was understood that there would be no further vote until the task force had a chance to consider the issue. But after a prolonged discussion, a majority of the board agreed in December to vote on the culling agreement in January, while still working to form the task force. 

In recent years, deer sightings have been on the rise, and the village has been getting an increasing number of complaints about landscaping damage, tick-borne diseases and deer droppings in resident yards. 

River Forest and the Cook County Forest Preserve District have been discussing the possibility of expanding the existing deer-culling program to the three forest preserves in River Forest — Thatcher Woods, G.A.R. Woods and Thomas Jefferson Woods. The Forest Preserve District contracts sharpshooters to go into the woods and kill the deer. The proposed contract called for the village to pay up to $40,000 a year, an amount that might decrease if River Forest entered an agreement with Elmwood Park to share the expense of the deer-culling program if it were expanded to include Forest Preserve District property within Elmwood Park boundaries, which are adjacent to the north of River Forest. Under that proposed agreement, as outlined in a Jan. 9 memo from Village Administrator Eric Palm to the village board, Elmwood Park would contribute up to $10,000 annually.

The majority of the 18 residents who addressed the village board during the resident comment portion of the Jan. 13 meeting opposed signing the intergovernmental agreement with the Forest Preserve District, but others offered support for the culling program. Resident comments ran well over an hour.

The main reason for opposing the culling program was a lack of qualified information, which many residents said would be addressed by forming the task force. Surveying residents was suggested by several speakers.

Several speakers expressed concerns about Lyme disease, which can be caused by ticks carried by deer and other animals.

"This is a health and safety issue," Village President Cathy Adduci said in advocating tabling a vote on the proposed intergovernmental agreement. "We want to solve this problem and get it right.

"We either start culling and create a task force or delay culling to study the issue."

During the discussion that followed the resident comment period, which also ran well over an hour, several trustees expressed frustration with the lack of information in the proposed intergovernmental agreement, specifically a work plan and determining the number of deer to be culled.

"We want to review the work plan," Trustee Robert O'Connell said.

Trustee Tom Cargie questioned whether Forest Preserve District officials would have sufficient time to create and implement a work plan by the end of March, which is the end of the time period when deer culling typically takes place.

"I don't see how they can do it," he said.

In the end, Adduci cited "too many questions and confusion" in supporting creation of the task force and deciding against voting on the proposed intergovernmental agreement.

She also suggested that the task force address the health issues, especially the Lyme disease risk, and recommend landscaping alternatives for residents whose property is close to the forest preserves. 

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

5 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Brian Slowiak  

Posted: January 26th, 2020 9:37 AM

Of course the deer have fled River Forest. The Cook County Real Estate bills are in the mail. and the deer do not want to loose any doe, no matter how small. Thank you ladies and gentlemen, I will be appearing here at The Hotel Sheets all weekend, next show at 11.

Sally Sugg from River Forest  

Posted: January 20th, 2020 5:52 PM

I've also noticed that the deer haven't been in my neighborhood for quite some time. I had even wondered if the deer culling had taken place without notifying the residents of River Forest.

Gregg Kuenster from River Forest CPA  

Posted: January 19th, 2020 2:28 PM

Adult Deer were removed in early October. The young were left behind. Ask anyone that lives near the woods. We named some of the older ones as they would visit our yards daily. We were sorry to see the deer go. I understand the complaints of some close to the woods. One soul's gem is another soul's garbage.

Bob Larson  

Posted: January 18th, 2020 11:58 AM

Eileen, you must have stopped at the marijuana dispensary since I see deer in Thatcher Woods daily & just saw 19 does along the road!

Eileen Marie Hourihan  

Posted: January 16th, 2020 8:30 PM

The deer are gone. They've been gone for months.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments