IDOT hopes to eliminate Oak Park's left-side ramps on the Eisenhower

What's up with the Ike?


Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Jean Lotus

Contributing Reporter

"Even highway exits go to the left in Oak Park," goes the old joke. In 1961, Oak Park's then-village president J. Russell Christianson lobbied hard to get left-hand exits when the "Congress Expressway" was built, seeking to decrease loss of property and noise levels. The name of the expressway changed to the "Eisenhower," but the ramps stayed on the left.

Drivers hate Oak Park's Eisenhower on- and off-ramps: Westbound, merging to the left causes last-minute maneuvers; traffic backs up on the off ramps — especially at Harlem — causing dangers on the highway. The Ike constricts to three lanes, which causes an almost permanent traffic jam between Austin and Harlem. Merging onto the eastbound Ike from Harlem is a race to get on before your lane disappears. The same with the Harlem westbound entrance.

And at the top of the ramps, trucks get stuck at the hairpin turns, panhandlers work the captive drivers, Harlem clogs up for blocks, buses stop at the CTA stations and close off the right lane, and pedestrians dash for their lives to cross the street going north.

What's so great about these left-hand highway exits anyway?

Reconfiguring ramps

If IDOT ever gets their wish of reconfiguring the Eisenhower, the left-hand ramps may be history. They aren't safe. According to a Federal Highway study, left-hand ramps have crash rates twice as high as the next highest type of ramp: 1.74 per million vehicles.

In real numbers, IDOT found that in three years, 2006 through 2008, 537 crashes occurred westbound between the Laramie and Austin exits with one fatality. Another 110 occurred at the Harlem off- and on-ramps. (The average crash rate on much of the rest of the highway for those three years was 27.) Seventy-seven percent of the collisions were rear-enders or sideswipes and occurred during a.m. or p.m. rush hour.

What would right-lane exits at Harlem and Austin look like? Jim Budrick, village engineer, guesses it would be a "diamond interchange" as opposed to the land-gobbling cloverleaf design. The interchanges would probably be built for high volume, perhaps similar to the very tall new I-355 interchanges. Almost 19,000 cars currently use the westbound Austin ramp daily, while 16,100 exit at Harlem going west.

With right-side ramps, houses might be endangered at Harrison and Maple and the Forest Park community garden property would be absorbed. On the south side of the highway at Harlem, any right-lane exit/entrance would have to contend with the Volvo dealership on the Oak Park side, the U-Haul property on the Forest Park side of Harlem and bridges over the train tracks. At Austin, exit construction might eat into Columbus Park and residential properties at Harrison and Garfield.

The IDOT study says if Austin and Harlem bridges are replaced, ramp angles will be softened to accommodate turning trucks and high-velocity traffic. Bus bumpouts will likely be added to stop buses from clogging right-hand lanes. Also more pedestrian safety precautions might be added. Two pedestrians were killed between 2006 and 2008 at the top of the Oak Park ramps, both around 4 a.m. on Sunday mornings.

IDOT gets involved

The Eisenhower's stretch through our village is one of the worst-rated patches of highway in Illinois: It gets an "F" in Level-of-Service rating from the Illinois Department of Transportation.

In August 2010, IDOT completed a nine-year "Environmental Phase 1" study of the problem. One option to get traffic moving through the failure zone is widening the Ike to four lanes through Oak Park, making one a carpool (or High Occupancy Vehicle — HOV) lane.

When IDOT began the study in 2001 this caused concern among Oak Parkers who worried that an expanded highway would mean a land-grab to the north — compromising two of Oak Park's business districts. Since 2001, a 122-member task force of volunteers, which includes Village President David Pope, has kept abreast of IDOT's plans. A sub-group advocates for "capping the Ike."

Rick Kuner, a retired transportation planner, founded Oak Park's Citizens for Appropriate Transportation. As former village trustee, Kuner has read every study IDOT has issued and attended many community meetings.

Kuner does not want to cap the Ike, but he believes adding an extra lane would be futile. "If you build it, [traffic] will come. It's called 'induced demand.' The Hillside Strangler construction (at Mannheim Road) cost $140 million and caused two years of disruption and only gained a minute. They just pushed the congestion further east." He points out that the Dan Ryan Expressway is 16 lanes wide in some spots and still has congestion.

Kuner is especially worried about one scenario in which IDOT declares eminent domain on a non-used third CTA rail line running parallel to the highway. This easement would be much better used, he said, by extending the CTA through Maywood into Westchester. The Maybrook Courthouse alone, he says, would contribute a significant ridership, as well as possible Park-and-Ride facilities in Hillside. Building more public transportation will reduce highway congestion, he contends.

But Kuner may be able to rest assured: In the August 2010 study, it appears IDOT has determined a train-track plan won't work. Railroad viaducts are too low: only 19 feet high. IDOT would have to raise every bridge by 4 feet (to 23 feet) or lower the grade of one highway lane by four feet, which is unacceptable.

Will this mean that the expansion of the Ike will take land to the north? IDOT is mum on that subject.

Whatever happens, lots of tax money, time and construction will be involved. With two high-volume highway interchanges emptying into Oak Park, perhaps towering over the rest of the village, Oak Parkers may soon miss the old left-hand ramps.

In any case, villagers like Rick Kuner are paying attention and making sure that IDOT acknowledges the village as a stakeholder.

"If I'm not willing to defend my neighborhood, what am I willing to defend?" he asks.

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

8 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Andy from Chicago  

Posted: February 16th, 2015 8:00 PM

Wow what a selfish little town. Based on the numbers supplied in this story on cars exiting at Harlem and Austin if only those cars were passing through this location over 950 years of time would have been saved if the lanes were on the right side and increased travel time by one minute over the last 40 years. Oh and Kuner, yes the traffic moved east after the hillside rebuild. To where? To the Oak Park interchange!! Thanks guys! Nobody love OP but your bumper stickers.

Andrew from Chicago from Chicago  

Posted: May 17th, 2011 11:17 AM

I drive the Ike regularly. This portion is an absolute nightmare due to these dam* ramps. Common sense in driving says slow and exiting vehicles on the right. That is where the merging should be. These ramps disrupt the traffic flow by forcing people to exit and enter on the opposite side of the traffic. There is constant battling by cars to merge quickly across all lanes of traffic. It is dangerous and a horrible design for traffic flow. Oak Park needs to take one for the team on this issue.

Really from Oak Park  

Posted: January 13th, 2011 7:41 AM

"Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues." This piece falls far short of that standard. High school journalism is better than this. How does such a mis-informed and misleading piece make the front page?

All For It from Oak Park  

Posted: January 12th, 2011 1:05 PM

who enjoys the added traffic and pollution from all of those cars stopped on the highway??? Maybe it's time OP stops thinking of itself completely different than any other village on the planet. How many millions have we spent on the idea of capping the Ike and fighting the state? Why should OP be the only village along I290 with left hand ramps & a capped highway. Just what OP needs, more parks that need to be maintained and eventually renovated with money we don't have.

Benn from Forest Park  

Posted: January 12th, 2011 12:54 PM

wow. this is insane. can't the blue line be extended?

Chris Donovan from Oak Park  

Posted: January 12th, 2011 10:04 AM

Regarding Rick Kuner's citing the August 2010 IDOT study, page 51 of the report indicates that the CSX clearance is just less than 20 feet for all the overpasses in Oak Park and Forest Park, and that 23 feet is needed, which infers that the Blue Line could not be moved over to occupy the underused CSX railbed using the CTA land to expand the Ike. But, 23 feet is needed for "double-stack" freight trains according to the report. The report doesn't say how much clearance is needed for CTA trains.

Jack Chalabian from Oak Park  

Posted: January 12th, 2011 8:59 AM

Its time for the Village to act!!! This is an election year, locally. SEOPCO where are you? This should be in the front and center on your agenda!!! Those who support the expansion, LISTEN CAREFULLY!!!! Our national infrastructure is failing, the highway trust fund is broke and you don't want to pay more in fuel taxes. Adding this roadway will mean more maintenance costs, thus it will cost you more in the future!!!!!

Jack Chalabian from Oak Park  

Posted: January 12th, 2011 8:56 AM

It appears IDOT is getting their way again. They have been pushing this project for years. I hope the efforts of Mr. Kuner's/and other CTA members are not going to be futile!!! The village has spent a significant amount of money over the last several years to lobby against this project at the Federal and State level. It appears the money has been wasted! The effort is going unnoticed and IDOT is proceeding with "their" vision.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad