Europe's Top Health Officials Say Masks Aren't Helpful.

They do?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Jim Bowman


Something wrong, if not rotten, in this state (country).

Denmark boasts one of the lowest COVID-19 death rates in the world. As of August 4, the Danes have suffered 616 COVID-19 deaths, according to figures from Johns Hopkins University.

That's less than one-third of the number of Danes who die from pneumonia or influenza in a given year.

Despite this success, Danish leaders recently found themselves on the defensive. The reason is that Danes aren't wearing face masks, and local authorities for the most part aren't even recommending them.

What the . . . ??

This prompted Berlingske, the country's oldest newspaper, to complain that Danes had positioned themselves "to the right of Trump."

"The whole world is wearing face masks, even Donald Trump," Berlingske pointed out.

Leave it to a newspaper. However:

This apparently did not sit well with Danish health officials. They responded by noting there is little conclusive evidence that face masks are an effective way to limit the spread of respiratory viruses.

"All these countries recommending face masks haven't made their decisions based on new studies," said Henning Bundgaard, chief physician at Denmark's Rigshospitale, according to Bloomberg News.

Denmark is not alone.


Despite a global stampede of mask-wearing, data show that 80-90 percent of people in Finland and Holland say they "never" wear masks when they go out, a sharp contrast to the 80-90 percent of people in Spain and Italy who say they "always" wear masks when they go out.

Dutch public health officials recently explained why they're not recommending masks.

"From a medical point of view, there is no evidence of a medical effect of wearing face masks, so we decided not to impose a national obligation," said Medical Care Minister Tamara van Ark.


Others, echoing statements similar to the U.S. Surgeon General from early March, said masks could make individuals sicker [!] and exacerbate the spread of the virus.

"Face masks in public places are not necessary, based on all the current evidence," said Coen Berends, spokesman for the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. "There is no benefit and there may even be negative impact."

And of course there's Sweden.

In Sweden, where COVID-19 deaths have slowed to a crawl, public health officials say they see "no point" in requiring individuals to wear masks.

"With numbers diminishing very quickly in Sweden, we see no point in wearing a face mask in Sweden, not even on public transport," said Anders Tegnell, Sweden's top infectious disease expert.


The top immunologists and epidemiologists in the world can't decide if masks are helpful in reducing the spread of COVID-19. Indeed, we've seen organizations like the World Health Organization and the CDC go back and forth in their recommendations.


CDC does not currently recommend the use of facemasks to help prevent novel #coronavirus. Take everyday preventive actions, like staying home when you are sick and washing hands with soap and water, to help slow the spread of respiratory illness. #COVID19

For the average person, it's confusing and frustrating. It's also a bit frightening, considering that we've seen people denounced in public for not wearing a mask while picking up a bag of groceries.

The truth is . . .

. . . masks have become the new wedge issue, the latest phase of the culture war. Mask opponents tend to see mask wearers as "fraidy cats" or virtue-signalling "sheeple" who willfully ignore basic science. Mask supporters, on the other hand, often see people who refuse to wear masks as selfish Trumpkins … who willfully ignore basic science.

There's not a lot of middle ground to be found and there's no easy way to sit this one out. We all have to go outside, so at some we all are required to don the mask or not.

Politics as usual:

It's clear from the data that despite the impression of Americans as selfish rebel cowboys who won't wear a mask to protect others, Americans are wearing masks far more than many people in European countries.

Polls show Americans are wearing masks at record levels, though a political divide remains: 98 percent of Democrats report wearing masks in public compared to 66 percent of Republicans and 85 percent of Independents. (These numbers, no doubt, are to some extent the product of mask requirements in cities and states.)

Our dilemma:

Whether one is pro-mask or anti-mask, the fact of the matter is that face coverings have become politicized to an unhealthy degree, which stands to only further pollute the science.

Last month, for example, researchers at Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy responded to demands they remove an article that found mask requirements were "not based on sound data."

The school, to its credit, did not remove the article, but instead opted to address the objections critics of their research had raised.

more more more at this very interesting site . . .

Email: Twitter: @BlitheSp

Love the Journal?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Wednesday Journal and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

5 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

William Dwyer Jr.  

Posted: September 18th, 2020 3:07 PM

I for one, am not nervous about you blathering about not needing to wear masks, Jim. I'm disgusted. Your opinion is simply wrong and reckless, and if people take it seriously and follow your ridiculous suggestion, they will put their health and possibly their life at risk. As far as relaxing, I'll relax when all my post-Covid-19 test are back. EKG is normal. Chest x-rays come back Monday. Got my fingers crossed, because I still suffer from chest tightness. Nationally, we'll pass 200,000 Covid deaths tomorrow or Sunday. Apparently that doesn't bother you. If not, perhaps you need to ponder what it means to be a true Christian.

Jim Bowman from Chicago  

Posted: September 18th, 2020 2:45 PM

Why are you all so NERVOUS about my suggesting that the masks don't make a difference, or at least don't qualify as gummint edict? RELAX.

U?is Spr?d?s  

Posted: September 18th, 2020 2:12 PM

He seems to imply that mask wearing is not associated with reducing the spread of Covid-19. As evidence he cites an opinion article with examples of European countries where people don't wear masks, yet the virus death toll has slowed to a crawl. As if the first led to the second. The strange consequence of this argument is that one could then infer that Covid-19 containment in the US would improve if we abandoned the mask mandate. That flies in the face of common sense. Masks are not meant to be a panacea, that's true, but to argue against their use is like saying that we should promote smoking to reduce lung cancer, or abandon seat belts to cut down on accident injuries and deaths.

William Dwyer Jr.  

Posted: September 18th, 2020 10:32 AM

Jim has, for some reason, opted to use his intellect to fight a rear guard action against reason and common sense. Such a shame.

Jahred Adelman  

Posted: September 18th, 2020 9:21 AM

Jim, you should sick to religion and other things that you know about, as opposed to epidemiology and science, which you know nothing about. This article is full of mis-interpreted facts and lies. The quote about the CDC, for example, is from FEBRUARY. Science evolves, and the CDC clearly recommends wearing masks: And masks are less necessary if the area has a low prevalence of the virus (if no one has the virus, you don't need to protect people from it). But this is not the case in much of this country.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2019

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2019 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments