26,10 and 22. What's The Magic Number?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Dave Coulter

Rough Edges

I don't often stray from writing about safe and comfortable topics like trees, stars, birds and such. But the news has been bloody in the past couple days, and much of that blood spilled from children. My informal survey of Saturday radio news announced 26 shooting deaths in Connecticut, 10 assorted shootings across Chicago last night - mostly teenagers, and 22 stabbings in China.

I've been wondering lately about when Americans will act to change the "gun situation" in our country. Apparently these recent numbers will do little to change our attitudes or our Constitution. I'm weary of people who use hunting as the traditional foil against gun control. Hunting, anymore, seems like a peculiar pastime in this society.

So what I want to know is this: what is the magic number? How many people need to get murdered by guns before the Constitution gets changed? Apparently recent numbers such as "26" and "10" aren't enough to get our attention. What will it take? A nice round number like 100? 200? 1000?

9-11, boy, that got our attention. We wanted blood, and we're still engaged in expeditions overseas fighting in the aftermath of that attack - 11 years on. We have Homeland Security now - and thank goodness, I say. We can stop some nutty shoe bomber, but we don't seem to be wired up to track a lunatic arming himself to the gills - legally?

Sadly, I realize that if I pull on this thread long enough it includes all of us, including me. We humans seem to have some deep flaw in our makeup. We on one hand, can be loving, even charitable. By the same turn we foster the likes of Stalin, Richard Speck, and so on. The same President who consoles us sends drones out that are not so precise where they don't kill and destroy innocent people as collateral damage. This is the human condition.

I think we have all the philosophical, legal, moral, and medical tools we need to get at what ails us. But I'm not sure we have the courage. As a species, we're cowardly. We're unwilling to stand up to the NRA, people who attack girls in Afghanistan, the list goes on.

I think we'll need to expand our ideas of weapons of mass destruction to include guns one of these days. In my mind that day passed some time ago, but I guess we haven't gotten collectively upset enough to admit that we need to take a hard look at the Second Amendment and the 18th century ideals that underpin it. What kind of country are we? What sort of species are we?  What's the magic number? What's your magic number?

Reader Comments

2 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Dave Coulter  

Posted: December 15th, 2012 12:35 PM

I hear you, but we need some new thinking. Or maybe that is simply beyond our "model" of primate? Bring back Homo habilis?


Posted: December 15th, 2012 12:26 PM

Well said, but under funded. Therein lies a large part of the problem. Anger and outrage on the part of the masses means little as long as politicians aim to supplicate the lobbyists and corporate entities who finance their election campaigns.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2018

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2018 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments