I strongly encourage you to assist the Magawa African Drum Studio in finding a new home in Oak Park. After such a dynamic beginning at its present Harrison Street location, it would be a grave loss for the Oak Park community if the studio leaves Oak Park when its temporary lease expires at the end of July.
Sometimes we need to look back to look ahead, and then we move beyond the past and re-commit to bettering the future of our children. For two years, I have wanted to voice my opinion on issues that started at Holmes School. Having related issues at Brooks that are now behind us, it is time to frankly discuss these issues.
As an Oak Park resident and grateful graduate of OPRF High School, I hope you will reject the Boosters' proposal for stadium lights on the high school football field and adjacent playing fields. There are other areas of our children's education that need more attention than the ability to play night games. Additionally, the long-term expenses and the harm to Oak Park's historical character make stadium lights undesirable.
Is the JOURNAL running an asinine letter contest I am not aware of? Or maybe Jack Hughes is one of those folks who is only happy when they have something to complain about ("Oak Park now a gulag," June 15).
The 16th annual Herb and Scented Plant Sale has now come and gone, which is hard to believe after 10 months of planning and preparation. But what a wonderful sale! After all these years it's clear that the Friends of the Oak Park Conservatory (FOPCON) have this event wonderfully well in hand.
I read the June 8 issue of WEDNESDAY JOURNAL and had to respond to several related issues. Marc Stopeck's cartoon was simply disgusting. The Geneva Convention on toilet paper? Give me a break. Ken Trainor believes we need a national day of atonement.
This responds to your editorial of June 1 titled "Taxman plays his cards downtown." Your analysis of the present situation was accurate, and you were right on the mark in urging the present village board to bestir itself and "enter into serious negotiations with Taxman."
In response to your column of May 11 ("It's good vs. good, not good vs. evil"), you propose that the dialogue about abortion should focus on how both the "good" of life for pre-born children and the "good" of a woman's reproductive rights (as you have defined them) can "win."