Boutet's conspiracy theories

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Dan Haley

Editor and Publisher

I wasn't at the meeting. I didn't watch it on TV. I haven't listened to the audio tape. But I kept hearing about the meeting the Oak Park Village Board held on Sept. 5 and how it went off the rails. 

The shouting. The finger-pointing. The accusations. All about the long-planned, exceedingly thoughtful and inclusive updating of the aged zoning ordinance. Launched from the board table by Trustee Simone Boutet and aimed at the available proxy, Tammy Grossman, the staff member who has led the eye-glazing zoning overhaul for more than two years. 

Grossman was at the podium to answer questions from trustees about the status of changes to the ordinance that trustees had requested at an earlier meeting.  

It was not a surprise when Boutet raised her concern about the wording, or the absence of wording, related to the required supermajority necessary for the village board to override a recommendation from the Plan Commission or Zoning Board of Appeals in matters related to Planned Unit Developments.

It wasn't a surprise because Boutet had telegraphed her concerns and whetted the conspiratorial inclinations of her Facebook base in a post three days in advance of the public meeting. In that social media post, Boutet alerted her supporters of her "discovery" that the supermajority requirement had vanished from the draft ordinance. "A complete break with our tradition," she said as she claimed adopting the ordinance as presented would allow four board members to approve the controversial Albion building. 

Let's be clear, consideration of Albion is governed fully by the old zoning ordinance. For Boutet to suggest otherwise is disingenuous.

But that's why the council chambers were packed. There were shenanigans on the loose, evil-doers at work to thwart democracy. Speaking to me Monday, Boutet talked about the "ovations" from the crowd, who later "sent me many thanks."

No doubt there are ovations and thanks to be earned for stirring up nonsense. We are a nation — and we are, it seems potentially, a village — inclined to be stirred up and divided into camps.

Trouble is, there was no conspiracy. No one on the board intended to remove the supermajority reference. No one on the board directed staff to omit a line from the text. You are left to argue whether there was an omission from the draft — an omission dating back perhaps a year when the consultant turned over the several-hundred-page document to the Plan Commission for its review — or a somewhat stultifying legal debate over whether the supermajority requirement was actually included, but in a slightly different portion of the document. 

In an interview Monday, Boutet said she didn't believe other members of the board had requested changes to the supermajority language. And despite what was described to me as haranguing Grossman from the board table, she said, "I don't want this to turn into open season on Tammy." 

Well, too late for that, Trustee. And to Grossman's great credit, she didn't put up with much of Boutet's harsh tone at the meeting, speaking up effectively for herself.

But, Trustee Boutet, if at this point you are no longer accusing your colleagues of tampering with the process and you are not accusing the staffer who shepherded this massive rewrite over two years, then just who are you accusing of malfeasance?

"Somebody took it out," she said. And somebody chose not to mention the omission during various presentations, she said. "I can't tell you who did it. I don't know."

Before making unfounded accusations to a rapt Facebook audience, Boutet, like any trustee, ought to reach out in advance to the board's single employee, the village manager, and ask questions, seek clarity. On Monday, I asked if she had done that. 

"No, I didn't reach out," she said. 

I asked if during her decade-plus as Oak Park's assistant village attorney and later acting village attorney, she'd benefited from having trustees offer that courtesy by reaching out to Ray Heise or the manager when there was a question on something coming out of the law department. They didn't call me, they called the manager, was her answer.

Exactly right.

Trouble is, Boutet doesn't like or trust the village manager. So she turned her conspiracy theories and her anger on a hard-working, highly-respected department head instead. Not the way it works.

Contact:
Email: dhaley@wjinc.com Twitter: @OPEditor

Reader Comments

6 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Tom MacMillan from Oak Park  

Posted: September 20th, 2017 5:56 PM

Lots of people in Oak Park want change, want progress. Unless the progress is tens of millions invested in DTOP at Albion, or the change is modernizing stale outdated old zoning. Then the people who always want change get upset at others over change.

Bruce Kline  

Posted: September 20th, 2017 11:59 AM

Once again Mr. Haley, reveals his bias for government by incompetent unaccountable bureaucrats. If an elected official performs the job they were elected to do ?" namely hold those unelected bureaucrats accountable to a minimum standard of performance, as Ms. Boutet has done ?" Mr. Haley somehow views this as being off putting, and inappropriate. This attitude is destructive to good representative government whereby elected official serve the people who elected them. I see nothing nothing wrong with Trustee Boutet demanding clarity and transparency from our unelected bureaucrats. If her manner or speech is too harsh for Mr. Haley's liking I have a suggestion. Follow Mr. Truman's advise: if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. It is about time that someone held these bureaucrat's feet to the fire and demanded competency, clarity and accountability. Thank you Trustee Boutet. Incidentally, I find Mr. Haley's attacks on Trustee Boutet just a further continuation of his ludicrous, inane, irrational sexist editorial opinion published during this past election.

Heinz Schuller from Oak Park  

Posted: September 20th, 2017 10:28 AM

Seeing the old guard get all bent out of shape like this is one good reason why I voted for Ms. Boutet. Challenge assumptions, push for transparency, weather the political blow-back from the well-entrenched.

Charlie Kohler  

Posted: September 20th, 2017 10:01 AM

Dan - I respectfully disagree with your attack on Trustee Boutet. What I believe the facts to be are: 1. This language was omitted from the document. 2. With the language omitted, how decisions could be made about a very controversial decision would be vague (and could be argued by the Village President that a super majority was no longer needed). 3. A simple "you're right, we didn't catch that and will add that back in and you can approve it at a later meeting" by Ms Grossman would have ended the entire discussion. 4. Ms Grossman has a very public history of ducking responsibility and making excuses to village residents and anyone who questions her - this is yet another one of those examples. I think that Trustee Boutet should be commended for finding this omission, and rightfully questioning the reason for the change. If you are arguing that process should have been done behind closed doors at Village Hall, I believe that you and I disagree on the level of transparency we expect from our tax-funded services.

Kate Ronan Upholstery from Oak Park  

Posted: September 20th, 2017 9:39 AM

Skewer her all you want Mr. Haley, but I for one, am glad someone's paying attention! And no offense, but I'll take the current elected Trustee and former acting Village Attorney's version of "how it works" over yours. On behalf of all the villagers who elected Boutet to be part of a much-needed check and balance system in village hall, "Thank you for your diligence Simone!" Glad to see someone's able to get the Village back on course.

Sandy Pedersen  

Posted: September 20th, 2017 8:49 AM

Interesting Mr. Haley, that you can comment with such authority on a meeting that you did not attend, or watch on tv, or listen to the audiotape of.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2017

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2017 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments