![]() |
Putting teachers above kids
![]() | Share on Facebook |
![]() | Share on Twitter |
![]() |
![]() |

By Dan Haley
On the West Side where we've published the Austin Weekly for 15 years, there are widening pockets of palpable energy, maybe even optimism, about education and learning. If there is a growth industry in Austin and Garfield Park it is in education. Private schools. Charters. Magnets. Elementary. High school. Not so much in pre-school where it is really vital.
This energy didn't start in the neighborhood Chicago Public Schools. It has been smothered in those schools for the most part and the exceptions within CPS are few and pretty recent. Teachers get just some of the blame. There is plenty of blame here and it can be shared equally and fairly. CPS is a failure. Principals have coasted and never been called to account. Parents have failed. The state has failed. Daley and the aldermen failed. We've all failed. We've all contributed to generations of failing.
But now we're in a moment where the focus is on the members of the Chicago Teachers Union and their rolling strike. The raises they've won — 16 percent over four years with the steps and the lane bumps included — and the health care they've secured can be chalked up to exceptional negotiating. Those teachers are now rightly worried that the new contract will hasten more school closings. That's inevitable. But the issues that have caused this strike to seep into Week Two are simply about putting teachers above kids.
Putting teachers above kids.
The union won this strike. They just didn't have the good judgment to claim victory on Sunday.
For this union to fight the beginnings of some sort of fair evaluation system for teachers is to deny the wondrous power of great teachers and the devastating impact of poor ones. It is the union saying the failed ways of the past 50 years of urban education that produce virtually no college graduates is plenty good enough.
To crow that you've beaten back merit pay is to reduce teaching to building cars and other robotic functions. To attempt to force principals to hire retread teachers from failed schools is to insist that all that matters is job security.
School reform is here. Rahm Emanuel will be able to claim some success toward reform even in this strike that he is losing. But the reform is happening imperfectly and erratically despite the union, despite the Chicago Public Schools. And it is starting with choice. Give West Side parents options and opportunities and a good number will choose alternatives to neighborhood schools that have failed their kids.
The choice is in the KIPP schools — co-founded by a River Forest fellow — which take all kids and committed parents and simply go to work. No magic. No tricks. No fancy tech. It is underway at Christ the King College Prep (aka Cristo Rey), the first new Jesuit school on the West Side in decades, which is now sending its first graduates off to college. It is happening at the Catalyst Schools like the one in the old Sienna High School building on Washington. At Providence-St. Mel's, the granddaddy of choice on the West Side. And it is happening in some CPS schools where principals have led, teachers have rallied, parents have partnered, communities have coalesced.
Is there a lack of trust between the union and CPS? There is bound to be. The job of leaders is to bridge such gaps and Emanuel and Karen Lewis of the CTU have failed to lead on that front.
Are the challenges profound? Poverty, unemployment, gang crime, fractured families. The list is staggering. And schools and their teachers can't ever overcome all that pain. But by rejecting efforts to change public education in poor black neighborhoods like Austin feels like teachers have lost all faith in their ability to change lives.
Find a garage sale near you!
| In search of local garage sales? Find out what sales are happening near you on our map and listing page. |
Quick Links
Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest. | |
| Subscribe | Classifieds |
| Photo store | Contact us |
| Submit Letter To The Editor | |
Latest Comments
sounds to me like you make a pretty convincing argument for switching OPA and...
By joe
Posted: June 19th, 2013 12:06 AM
By John Butch Murtagh
Posted: June 18th, 2013 11:42 PM
Great review. Of course, there are those of us who will forever believe that...
By Leonard Grossman
Posted: June 18th, 2013 11:17 PM
I think this concept is very helpful. I'm wondering why, though, he felt...
By Bridgett
Posted: June 18th, 2013 11:00 PM
The fact that there were no other interested developers in the Colt site bodes...
By This Does Not Bode Well for Lake/Forest
Posted: June 18th, 2013 10:41 PM
Personally (and, really, what other way is there?) I enjoyed reading your post....
By Mr. Borderman
Posted: June 18th, 2013 8:48 PM
Yes, the store is darling, isn't it? But it's priced for people who...
By Mr. Borderman
Posted: June 18th, 2013 8:45 PM
By Dave Coulter
Posted: June 18th, 2013 6:29 PM
If any team can come back and win a series after falling behind, it's this...
By Mark D
Posted: June 18th, 2013 3:48 PM









OP parent
Posted: September 21st, 2012 11:55 AM
I heard Karen Lewis demeaning the idea of testing Kindergarden kids 5 or 6 times a year - before they could even read. Typical union sound bite trashing a sound idea. ISATs 5 or 6 times a year - no. Conduct an assessment to see if a kid's learning is on track 5 or 6 times a year - yes. Why wait a whole year to find out a kid hasn't made progress. Sadly OP teachers are also opposed to interim assesement. Of course, if a kid isn't learning, the teacher may need to do something different.