Competing visions for the future

Opinion: Columns

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Adrian Ayres Fisher

One View

'They're such dinosaurs," said an acquaintance, speaking about both the Oak Park Economic Development Corporation and the proposed Albion development. 

I thought she was being unduly harsh until I attended the Plan Commission meetings, studied the proposal and revisited Envision Oak Park, the village's Comprehensive Plan, published in 2014. I realized that at stake are competing visions for the future.

When the Comprehensive Plan was being developed, I was proud to serve on the citizens' working group focused on sustainability. Every topic-focused group did good work, believing its efforts would make a positive difference to the future of Oak Park. It was exciting to see so much citizen engagement.

The plan's premise, the vision, is to imagine Oak Park from the prospect of the year 2030. Sustainability — environmental, social, economic, civic — was a guiding theme for the whole, and the final document reflects this, its 14 interrelated goals encompassing all four realms in compatible, interlocking ways. The plan expresses all that is best about Oak Park, incorporating our progressive values, desire to support diversity, education, the arts, architectural integrity, and, not least, sustainable business development, while promoting environmental and human health. 

Aspirational, for sure, but also, emphatically, not intended to be shelved, as so many plans are. Nope, our plan states that, "continuous use will reinforce the role of the 'Plan' as the playbook and official policy guide for the community."

The Park District of Oak Park gets this. They clearly take both the plan and its vision of the future very seriously. Improving green space, reducing pesticide use, adding native plant gardens, installing solar panels, and offering programs that enhance environmental awareness and human social and physical health: It's easy to draw direct correlations between the plan's goals and their actions. 

A real jewel in their crown, of which all Oak Park residents can be proud, is the Environmental Education Center in Austin Gardens, designed, as park district representatives repeatedly stated during Plan Commission meetings, to educate the public about environmental sustainability and serve as a model for sustainability improvements that can be made by homeowners.

Thus on the one hand, we have Albion, enabled by OPEDC and village government, pushing for a development that would directly impede one of our community's best efforts to implement the Comprehensive Plan. Their approach seems so counter to plan goals and so backward-looking in terms of cultural assumptions, context sensitivity and genuinely sustainable design that it really does seem dinosaur-ish, particularly in light of the culturally fraught, environmentally damaged, climate-change-impacted future that is already upon us.

On the other, we have, besides the park district, numerous local green and social organizations and thousands of individual Oak Park citizens who are looking to, and in multiple ways preparing for, the future reflected in the plan. This future not only will require sustainability and resiliency adjustments in the face of real and increasing challenges, but also could bring environmental, social, economic and civic rewards — if we continue the difficult work of implementing the plan in earnest, without undoing material progress already made.

There is an old Native American saying: "The world is as sharp as the edge of a knife." Navigating wisely requires courage, discernment, and foresight, based on a broader, systems-based understanding of reality than that provided by simplistic self-interest. 

Oak Park has an exemplary vision and a very-well-thought-out Comprehensive Plan. The Albion project, if approved and built, would betray the trust of thousands of residents and short-sell our community's future. 

Will our elected and appointed leaders have the wisdom to listen to engaged citizens and the courage and discernment to take the good, as opposed to the seemingly expedient, decision?

Adrian Ayres Fisher is an Oak Park resident and member of the commission that designed the 2014 Envision Oak Park Comprehensive Plan.

Reader Comments

3 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Ana Garcia Doyle  

Posted: August 24th, 2017 2:25 PM

Thoughtful and potent, Adrian. Thank you for these important insights. I too hope there will be a consideration of your comments, and of the work we and so many other citizens did together 3 years go to envision a resilient, healthy, thriving Oak Park for the future.

Jim Coughlin  

Posted: August 23rd, 2017 11:56 PM

An important message that unfortunately will never be received by the closed minds of Abu-Taleb and his rubber stamp trustees. The Village President has bullied and ridiculed everyone who opposes the construction of this environmental disaster. He stacked the Plan Commission to get the project approved and has enough trustees in his pocket to seal the deal.

Tom Bassett-Dilley  

Posted: August 23rd, 2017 3:48 PM

Excellently said, Adrian--thank you.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2017

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2017 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad