River Forest township, village meet to consider options

Sloan, Palm to continue discussions

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Deb Kadin

Contributing Reporter

The management structure of the River Forest Civic Center Authority could be changing as administrators from River Forest village and township governments soon begin setting priorities on collaborative efforts between the two governments that could start in the coming months.

After a historic meeting Monday night between elected officials, Village Administrator Eric Palm and Township Supervisor Carla Sloan will examine the intricacies of Civic Center issues, which are already being studied by the township. The pair also will explore if there may be space for the township to be housed at village hall. 

Other possibilities on the table after Monday's meeting include funneling township committee openings and other township information through the village website.

All of the village trustees were present; township elected officials not in attendance were trustees Mark Kelty and Mary O'Brien.

There is no timetable for when any of the list of efforts raised Monday will be tackled. There also is no indication of when the elected officials will meet again. Leaders, though, came out of the meeting encouraged.

"This is just the start of our conversation. … There are common areas to work on," said Village President Catherine Adduci, who called for a collaborative effort between the two units of government shortly after her state of the village address in May. "Eric and Carla will take care of the next steps. This will take some time."

Sloan agreed. "There is a lot here that merits consideration," she said.

The item that most likely will merit immediate attention will be the Civic Center Authority building, also known as the community center, 8020 Madison St. Sloan said that for about a year, township trustees have been trying to reshape the structure of this complex relationship and more clearly spell out how the costs flow so that people can "make more sense of it." Township trustees are also assessing the "fair market value" of the position of the building manager, who since 2000 has been Dick Chappell, who also serves as the executive director of the community center. 

The Civic Center Authority is a distinct unit of government created by state legislation in 1984. Township trustees are on the CCA board, which manages the community center building. The community center, a non-profit that has been in operation since the 1970s, runs the center's programs; a separate board of directors oversees the programming.

Historically, Sloan said, this integrated relationship was set up for many good reasons and the relationship made sense. "It worked, and it was good, but we need to move forward," she said.

Adduci noted that the village government also manages the operations of buildings, such as village hall, the fire department, public works and others. One notion that administrators may examine is whether public works can weigh in on building management and consider including the village department when any building improvements are needed there. 

In addition to talking about possible collaboration efforts, the 90-minute meeting focused on answering a myriad of trustee questions about township operations and areas where collaboration would not be deemed likely, including the assessor's office and General Assistance.

Sloan ruled out a suggestion from the village that a human services commission be set up to tackle village-wide concerns related to seniors, youth and mental health. A community liaison could be appointed, however, to each committee and report back to the village. 

A committee on seniors and another on youth consist of people from both River Forest and Oak Park as they focus on programs that can be used by residents in both communities. The programs themselves are administered by Oak Park Township. River Forest has its own mental health commission. 

Youth and mental health committees review grant applications and recommend funding to agencies that perform services for residents. Funding is approved by respective township boards. Senior programs are not funded through a grant process but get their dollars from Cook County and the state. 

Some of the efforts identified Monday could be seen as small, but that discussions are taking place at all is huge as for months the village and the township were at loggerheads over proposed state legislation which could have led to a local referendum resulting in the merger of the two governments. 

Adduci was a strong backer of HB 4425, the referendum bill sponsored in the General Assembly by Rep. Chris Welch (D-7th). The bill was put on hold when Welch could not muster support for its passage in committee. 

Other previous attempts at discussing consolidation or collaboration were not realized in recent years. Talks fizzled before they even got started in 2012. Just this past January, a discussion about the bill between Welch and village and township officials was unproductive. 

Talks this winter between Palm and Sloan were unproductive, and no other discussions were re-scheduled. The township sought a meeting this winter to talk about its programs and services. Village trustees preferred to see talks continue between respective administrators. 

Reader Comments

7 Comments - Add Your Comment

Comment Policy

Rich   

Posted: July 21st, 2014 7:44 PM

Lets all agree the township can run better. Lets all agree their is duplication. Lets all agree that we in RF want to help those with less and those with disabilities. Lets all agree that there are other arms in RF that could do a better job due to their deeper pockets. Lets all agree that we all Need to come together and make a Better solution for all of RF.

Molly from River Forest  

Posted: July 18th, 2014 10:58 AM

I agree that the fair market value of a building supervisor needs to be addressed. I would believe his contract is for a full time position, since his salary is over $ 67,000.00 per year - so how can he do 2 jobs at the same time. Seems like the tax payers of RF are losing out to the fee payers of the Community Center.

Tom-RF  

Posted: July 17th, 2014 9:45 PM

Enough not listening. Let's shoe RF residents we can do better. Service levels are important - and lower taxes to residents are even more important.

Joan from River Forest  

Posted: July 17th, 2014 10:19 AM

We need Oak Park to speak up and help lead the charge with River Forest. We need to ask ourselves can we do better? The answer is yes! We don't need to be taxed by 10 units of government. Oak Park Assessor's article in the WJ shows 10 taxing bodies indicating that our tax bill will NOT go down. We must streamline government and insist on lowering our tax bill through consolidation. Stop the fiefdoms!

Brian from Oak Park  

Posted: July 17th, 2014 9:35 AM

We hope you all will lead the way so that we can do likewise in Oak Park.

Joan from River Forest  

Posted: July 17th, 2014 9:18 AM

Let's consolidate the Township and save taxpayer money.

RF Achievement  

Posted: July 16th, 2014 8:07 AM

Good first steps, better for RF residents to see and hear of the road map by September. EVERYTHING at this stage should be up for discussion - the Universe, then begin to Prioritize. The fact that such a major discussion was scheduled, postponed and scheduled again to deal with conflicts -- and some still choose not to Attend is less than transparent. If you choose to run for public office, you HAVE to be in the public light and state your positions. Interesting in who was not there.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassifieds
Photo storeContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor