Collaboration for breakfast

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Dan Haley

Editor and Publisher

Well, this has never happened before. In 33 years at the Journal, I have never been invited out for breakfast by the presidents of the village of Oak Park, the OPRF High School board and the District 97 Board of Education.

I mean simultaneously. Around one table. With one message.

It happened on Monday. And the immediate news is that the two school districts will sign on to a village request for cooperation in amending the Downtown TIF and give the village more money and more tools to clinch a deal with a developer for the Colt site on Lake Street — aka the world's most expensive surface parking lot.

As both Bob Spatz of D97 and John Phelan of D200 said over breakfast at George's, these properties are owned by the village right now, and they aren't throwing off any property taxes to the schools anyhow.

"When you ain't got nothing, you've got nothing to lose," was Phelan's summary.

So before the month is out, both 200 and 97 will have agreed to amend the 2011 TIF settlement, ending a discouraging, expensive and revealing lawsuit that saw the high school suing the elementary schools and the village amid raw feelings and intense mistrust.

And this was the larger message, the bigger news as Phelan put it: "If 2011 was the end of the era of litigation, then 2013 is the beginning of the era of collaboration." And, he added, he hoped River Forest's village government and its elementary schools would also actively join the discussions on shared initiatives.

Phelan was still new to the D200 board as the long litigation process was forced into mediation by a federal judge. A labor lawyer by trade, Phelan joined the high school's negotiating team and progress was quickly made toward a settlement — a settlement that favored the high school but a settlement that sharply eased the rhetoric and set aside the personal mistrust among the parties.

Spatz talked about the convoluted TIF agreement of 2003 and said that by 2009 no one was left at any of the three bodies to decipher it, its appendix, its footnotes. He talked about the failures of the bodies to meet regularly to talk about the TIF and solve issues as they came up. That led to the lawsuit, which pitted elected officials against each other and put any shared ventures on hold.

"I can't judge the people of 2003 or the litigation period because I wasn't there," said Phelan. "But it has made clear the importance of meeting regularly and building trust. We have all been schooled by that experience."

A lot has been made of the import of the April election on Oak Park's village government and rightly so. But if there is an elected body that was smartly remade by voters this spring it is at the high school. With four new members, a majority, and the still-new Phelan installed as president, this board has had a fresh psyche appended to its traditional ways. We are seeing results already.

At Monday's breakfast, Village President Anan Abu-Taleb was the quiet one. With the help of outgoing president David Pope, he had set this scenario in place and was happy to have the school board leaders do the talking. And while this TIF amendment is something of a no-brainer, the collaboration earlier this spring among the three bodies to fund an initiative in early childhood education was bold and courageous.

The table is set for more shared efforts. Leaders are in place who are ready to measure success not solely in building their own institutions but in the power of cooperation.

Email: Twitter: @OPEditor

Reader Comments

10 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy


Posted: June 12th, 2013 9:45 AM

Same false dichotomy previously created by the village with other downtown projects, which is only comparing new subsidized development (with multiple zoning variances) with the current site owned by village. Problem is that it omits the viable option of selling village property, zoned as is, on the open market (or never purchasing the property and demolishing buildings and vacating business in the first place). The village should sell the Colt/Westgate property and then get out of the way.

Dan Haley from Wednesday Journal Wednesday Journal Employee

Posted: June 11th, 2013 5:47 PM

Paddy Boy! You been to George's? Crab cakes with poached eggs? I had oatmeal with fresh blueberries. Darned tasty.

Galen Gockel from Oak Park  

Posted: June 11th, 2013 5:39 PM

Is it completely coincidental that this detente followed close on the heels of the departure of the OPRFHS Director of Finance?

Paddy Boy  

Posted: June 11th, 2013 5:13 PM

Bloody Mary's? Crab cakes w/poached egg? tell the truth>

Village Voice  

Posted: June 11th, 2013 4:33 PM

Well I'm curious who picked up the tab for this breakfast. Seems like when talk of collaboration was first brought up during the depths of the downturn, it was in the spirit of saving public money. Of late, its seems the taxing agencies have used it as a creative cover for spending more tax payer money with obscured accountability. Agreeing to stop suing each other is certainly a start, but lets hope the trend of "collaboration" as code for fleecing the taxpayer ends too.

John Butch Murtagh from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: June 11th, 2013 4:30 PM

I really was angry with the way this Clark project was brought to the public and felt there should have been a detailed discussion of the project before the village went to D200 and D97 for Tif Funds. There is a feeling of trust and collaboration in the air. That's good. I'm going to the backyard to read a book.

Alberg from Oak Park  

Posted: June 11th, 2013 4:09 PM

It's refreshing to see that our elected officials have embraced CHANGE ! It's about time. Discussions about the TIFs should be held in public - and in English. Trying to decypher the TIF reports is like trying to read Russian. Let's start by taking the assumptions of revenue for each of the major projects and comparing them with the actual revenues now being received to see if the returns are what were promised.

Three cheers  

Posted: June 11th, 2013 3:53 PM

Good news, indeed. Think you can get the Park District to join the breakfast club?

Patricia Koko from Oak Park  

Posted: June 11th, 2013 3:29 PM

WOW! it is almost as if someone was listening to the discussion of the Governmental Excellence task force at Envision Oak Park. Collaboration has been a top priority in our goal setting. Congratulations to all parties. Please keep it up!

Jeff Schroeder from Oak Park  

Posted: June 11th, 2013 3:26 PM

Good news. I have always felt that these three groups should think a little more collaboratively. After all, to the taxpayer, it is one bill that we are asked to pay. When the three governments fight, we all end up paying more.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2017

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2017 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad