Cost of D97 an investment

Opinion: Letters To The Editor

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Jack Crowe misses the point in his recent comments about the upcoming District 97 referendum ("Cut costs before passing a referendum at D97"), March 16, 2011 Wednesday Journal).

As a third generation Oak Parker, Mr. Crowe should appreciate how Oak Park benefits from having what he admits are the "excellent theatre programs" of BRAVO and CAST. He should know they provide a unique opportunity for kids to develop confidence in themselves and camaraderie with their fellow class mates. The combination of teamwork, dedication, art and sheer fun these programs provide should not be so easily dismissed. Their presence makes Oak Park a special place. Their loss should concern Oak Park parents and all Oak Parkers. Budgets and taxes are important, but funding these programs must take priority.

But to address his points:

Teacher compensation: He says they get paid too much. I say you get what you pay for. I think it's safe to say most Oak Parkers agree District 97 provides at least above average schools and teachers. Good schools are the reason people come here and stay here. Also, there's a national debate ongoing about elevating the qualifications (and salaries) of teachers to help improve education in troubled school districts. We are fortunate Oak Park schools are not so "troubled". They could be improved, like any other school district, but today they do a pretty good job of educating our kids. If you want to reduce your tax bill, move to a school district that pays less, and gets less in return.

Real estate tax bill: Crowe mentions they have doubled over the last 20 years and admits it's due to rising real estate values. But then he seems to put the blame on the schools. Huh? District 97 tax rate has not changed since 1989.

Your tax bill rose because home values rose. Period.

Structural problems: Crowe cites automatic salary increases, health care and pensions that drive up costs. Again, are the schools perfect? No, but as a matter of fact, the district has shown due diligence by cutting its budget steadily for the last nine years. Can more changes be made and costs be brought down? Sure.

So here is the point: vote to keep District 97 fully funded, so it can continue to do great things for all of Oak Park.

Vote Yes on April 5th!

Michael Awe
Oak Park

Reader Comments

2 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

fuzzy logic from Oak Park  

Posted: April 1st, 2011 7:26 PM

>>"Your tax bill rose because home values rose. Period."<< Yep, that why it's so great that as home values have fallen, my tax bill has gone down- errr... wait.

researcher from op  

Posted: April 1st, 2011 2:50 PM

Michael: Unfortunately, there are a number of school districts that deliver better academic performance for less tax burden. So, when you flippantly say "move to a school district that pays less..." it shows that you haven't done your homework. So, despite "cutting its budget steadily for the past 9 years", it's still an inefficient system. To keep funding this "above average" system is fine, but why not strive for actual greatness? Doesn't OP deserve it? Don't our children deserve more?

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2017

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2017 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad