Oak Park Village Board seeks policy review on zoning authority

Past decisions about 'hardship,' proper use of building spark change

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Anna Lothson

Staff Reporter

Concerns about the criteria for granting variances for businesses has the Oak Park board questioning village policies.

In January, the board asked the Oak Park Plan Commission to hold a public hearing regarding amendments to the zoning ordinance as it relates to the commission's review authority for granting use variances in the transit-related overlay district and the perimeter overlay district.

Essentially, these are two districts that have certain restrictions on uses, based on the designated purpose of the district. Transit-related retail overlays are designed to protect existing retail and encourage new development; perimeter overlays are in place to address the gateways to the village that create an overall first impression for visitors.

Recent decisions, however, permitting two uses that did not match those regulations, have caused the board to ask the plan commission and the Zoning Board of Appeals to decide if policy should be changed on approving specific uses.

A non-retail use, a Tae Kwon Do studio, was recently granted approval to move into 111 S. Oak Park Avenue. This caused concern among business owners in the Hemingway District as well as the Business Advisory Council. The use was eventually permitted by the zoning board, which currently acts as a regulatory authority and whose actions do not not need final say from the village board.

Village staff has discussed internally whether this approval process should change so that the decision process starts with a village board referral, which would then come back to trustees for a final decision based on the zoning board recommendation.

At Monday night's meeting, a first reading of the zoning text amendment was in front of the board, but trustees decided, in light of recent decisions and many questions, the process as a whole needs to be re-evaluated.

Plan commission Chair Linda Bolte explained to the board that the group felt there were "weaknesses in the standard as they were reflected" in the current code. The group is looking for more of a substantive and consistent definition about what uses fit and which don't so that businesses are better informed about where they should look when coming to Oak Park.

Trustee Colette Lueck, later backed by her colleagues, said the confusion on this issue shows it's time to "step way back" and question the process in place.

"It seems to me that we need more information about standards," Lueck said. "Sometimes the evidence supports the standards. ... It seems to me that needs to be answered before we make a decision."

Trustee Adam Salzman said the system is not working the way it's supposed to, and there is a gap when it comes to the responsibility of the zoning board, the plan commission and the village board in terms of making these decisions.

Trustees compared the process to using a GPS: This is when your device would be telling you to "recalculate." And that's what the board decided to do Monday night.

After much discussion, with all of the board in agreement about the existence of holes in the policy, the item was referred back to the plan commission and will be discussed by the zoning board and plan commission, then brought back to the board at a later meeting.

Contact:
Email: anna@oakpark.com Twitter: @AnnaLothson

Reader Comments

10 Comments - Add Your Comment

Comment Policy

OP Resident  

Posted: March 22nd, 2013 4:06 PM

This manipulation of statistics always cracks me up. The north half of Oak Park is about as diverse as Kenilworth.

Enuf is Enuf from Oak Park  

Posted: March 22nd, 2013 8:31 AM

Why does Pope keep on incorrectly claiming that "statistically, OP is successfully the most diverse city in the U.S."? According to the report "Racial Residential Segregation and Exclusion in Illinois" (Maria Krysan, 2009), using a dissimilarity index to measure the level segregation on a census block level (0-100, 0 = no segregation, 100 = complete segregation), OP has a dissimilarity index of 45.1, placing it 14th amongst 44 communities, behind Hillside (29.3) and Forest Park (38.3).

John Butch Murtagh from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: March 21st, 2013 11:41 PM

With you, Unfortunately.

Unfortunately  

Posted: March 21st, 2013 9:53 PM

@JBM - the VMA is up to their regular election tactics - SLIMING any and all who don't agree with their VMA-Uber-Alles candidates. Discuss issues? Hardly - it's just SLIME, SLIME, and then some more SLIME. Why? Because the bullies honestly believe that they are the saviors of Oak Park and all that is divine within this village - their will and, ahem, dictates, must be obeyed by the citizenry! It has always - and will remain - their vaunted modus operandi. And, yep, they are proud of it!

John Butch Murtagh from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: March 21st, 2013 8:25 PM

Thanks Adam and Resident, I respect their right to write anything they want. That's what the WJ Comments is all about.

Resident from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: March 21st, 2013 7:04 PM

I find John to be a breath of fresh air. Beats the BS coming out of the village board meetings. If his comments help one person understand that all is not well in village hall, possibly even vote for change, then his efforts are worth the time and energy spent.

Adam Smith  

Posted: March 21st, 2013 6:39 PM

Ignore the haters JBM; clearly you hit some nerves. If they didn't see some truth in your criticism they wouldn't comment at all. Keep posting, I don't have to agree to support your right to comment and won't hate on your enthusiasm.

Hilarious from Oak Park  

Posted: March 21st, 2013 4:01 PM

@Again. I'm still laughing at your comment. That sums it up. Should someone tell Anan that Murtagh is not helping his cause? It's kind of embarrassing.

Again and Always from Oak Park  

Posted: March 21st, 2013 3:46 PM

Just like the subtle nagging pain of an old filling going bad, my day is not complete without a John Butch Murtagh comment at the bottom of EVERY article. You would think that as his comments go up into "the Cloud", one day they will constitute their own storm front.

John Butch Murtagh from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: March 19th, 2013 10:33 PM

I'm not a big fan of the Plan Commission, but in this case it sounds like the board is crying because they didn't get their way. Ms. Lueck comment is a classic example of trying to fix the rules to match her choice. "It seems to me that we need more information about standards," Lueck said. "Sometimes the evidence supports the standards. ... It seems to me that needs to be answered before we make a decision."

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
Photo storeContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad