Oak Park reduces Lake Street project price tag

Village board cuts cost by nearly $3.5 million


Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Timothy Inklebarger

Staff Reporter

The Oak Park Board of Trustees approved a resolution on Monday night, directing village staff to reduce the projected cost of a sweeping downtown beautification and infrastructure proposal from an estimated $18.5 million to about $15 million.

Village staff and business community volunteers have been planning the Lake Street streetscaping project for years. When it begins in 2019, it will include repaving of the roadway from Harlem Avenue to Austin Boulevard, replacement of water and sewer lines in the downtown area, and beautification of sidewalks and street crossings from Harlem to Euclid.

The board discussed the project at its Feb. 5 meeting, but its most recent deliberations on the project focused more on cost reduction. 

A $3 million federal transportation grant will be used for some of the roadway work, and $1.3 million will be covered from the village's Water and Sewer Fund, while the rest will be paid for through the village's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Village Manager Cara Pavlicek said general obligation bonds are expected to pay for about 80 to 90 percent of the village's portion of the project.

Oak Parkers testifying Monday had mixed opinions on how much should be spent on the project, with several arguing that the high property tax burden in Oak Park should compel elected officials to reduce the cost of the project.

James Peters, a member of the community group Oak Park Property Tax Watch, encouraged trustees to cut out a portion of the project that runs along Marion Street, north of Lake Street. Peters said that section of Marion only has a handful of businesses, and removing it from the project would save taxpayers about $2 million.

Others argued for eliminating costly bluestone sidewalks and brick and granite pavers that are planned for the project. Oak Park resident Maureen Kleinman, who also is a member of the Oak Park Property Tax Watch group, said the materials would not hold up against heavy traffic and salt used to melt winter snow.

Mike Fox, owner of the Carleton Hotel and a large commercial property owner along Lake Street in downtown and the Hemingway District, urged trustees not to skimp too much on the details. Fox, a volunteer on the village's streetscape advisory committee, said the original plan for the streetscaping project aimed to incorporate materials used in the Marion Street streetscaping project to connect the downtown area to the Hemingway District around Lake and Oak Park Avenue.

He said businesses in the construction zone would be disrupted for 18 months — the life of the streetscaping project — and some would not survive because of the loss of customers who don't want to deal with the traffic. 

"If you're going to close the street for 18 months and put back concrete and asphalt, I would say don't do it," he said.

Trustees gave their proposed price tags for the project, none of whom argued for spending the entire projected $18.5 million. 

"No one wants to spend $18 million on this project," Trustee Jim Taglia said, agreeing that the North Marion Street portion of the proposal should be scrapped. "We all want an attractive downtown, but we don't want to go broke doing it." Taglia owns a frozen yogurt shop on Lake Street.

Trustee Bob Tucker said he also was in favor of scaling the project back to between $12 million and $15 million, but added that the streetscaping needs to create a sense of place to attract visitors to the village. "Downtown Oak Park is becoming a destination," he said. "I want to invest; I don't want to just spend."

Trustee Deno Andrews said he believes most visitors come to Oak Park for attractions like the Frank Lloyd Wright Home and Studio, not bluestone sidewalks, which he argued have a "country club" feel. Andrews said the village needs to focus its efforts on other parts of the village and not just downtown. 

He said North Avenue, Austin Boulevard and both Chicago Avenue and Roosevelt Road east of Ridgeland Avenue are "a disaster." "We have to be cautious about business district equity," he said. 

Andrews, along with Trustees Simone Boutet and Dan Moroney, voted no on the revised $15 million price tag, while trustees Tucker, Taglia, Andrea Button and Mayor Anan Abu-Taleb voted yes.

* This story was updated to correct the amount of the federal grant that will be used to help fund the project.

CONTACT: tim@oakpark.com

Reader Comments

7 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Judith Alexander from Oak Park  

Posted: March 2nd, 2018 9:39 AM

Thanks to Trustee Andrews for reminding the board and staff that North Ave. and several other districts are blighted and neglected. How will this expenditure on a district that is already thriving benefit the village as a whole? I'm willing to be convinced, but I truly do not understand.

Neal Buer from Oak Park  

Posted: March 1st, 2018 12:17 AM

Jim, it's like someone buying a Lamborghini knowing they will have to file for bankruptcy.

Jim Coughlin  

Posted: February 28th, 2018 9:09 PM

The Village has a massive financial obligation looming relating to pension funding. Abu-Taleb and his rubber stamps would rather spend millions on snazzy sidewalks, paving bricks, landscaping and a fountain than deal with the reality of what do about a $100 million payment that cannot be ignored.

Neal Buer from Oak Park  

Posted: February 28th, 2018 7:08 PM

Leslie, how much did you contribute to the campaigns of those who voted for bluestone?

Leslie Roberts  

Posted: February 28th, 2018 6:51 PM

The residents on both sides of our alley were just told our alley is going to be resurfaced. I just learned that the cost is paid from the quarterly water bills we all get. Then we were offered an option of having our garage aprons done at that time at each of the resident's expense. We were also given the option of the alley done in brick so rain water will drain into the ground for approximately $100,000 for the all the alley residents to share -- maybe $3,000 each for 30 houses. In other words, if we wanted something fancy, not ordinary, we residents who use the alley have to pay for it. So why not have the owners of the buildings along Lake St. pay for the extra cost of any fancy road or sidewalk that is out of the ordinary for the rest of the village?

Jeff Schroeder from Oak Park  

Posted: February 28th, 2018 3:50 PM

General Obligation Bonds means that the taxpayers will be paying for this project over a long period. It is not going to come out of existing TIF funds. It also means that there will be an additional interest cost that will have to be added to the total. Long term debt financing makes sense to the extent that this project will benefit the community in the future. The problem is that we have a lot of these bonds already.

Neal Buer from Oak Park  

Posted: February 28th, 2018 8:25 AM

"If you're going to close the street for 18 months and put back concrete and asphalt, I would say don't do it," said Mike Fox, owner of the Carlton Hotel and commercial properties on Lake Street. Sounds like asphalt and concrete is not good enough for the landed gentry of Oak Park. When I look out the window of my home I see an asphalt street and concrete sidewalks. But hey, who am I but the taxpayer paying for your bluestone sidewalks in front of your buildings. This area has been a designated TIF for 20 years. Did anyone even ask why the TIF funds weren't used to make these improvements years ago? Just asking.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2017

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2017 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad