Contract watching

Opinion: Editorials

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Editorial

OPRF recently bounced its contractor/architectural consultant of many years. That's likely what happens when a high school can't put water in its pools for a semester due to a near endless series of miscues and misdirection by the outgoing firm.

Now the school is closing in on a new contractor, with the architecture function wisely segregated. Last week, though, the hiring was delayed for multiple reasons. One was the insistence by board member John Allen on language expressing a genuine effort to hire minority subcontractors.

That's wise oversight by a valued board member.

Reader Comments

1 Comment - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Roger Clegg from Falls Church, Virginia  

Posted: February 2nd, 2011 7:33 AM

Contracting programs should be open to all, bidding opportunities widely publicized beforehand, and no one discriminated against because of race or sex. But that means no preferences because of race or sex either--whether it's labeled a "quota" or a "goal," since both end up amounting to the same thing. Such discrimination is unfair, it costs the taxpayers money to award a contract to someone other than the lowest bidder, and it's almost always unconstitutional (see ). Those who engage in such discrimination should be sued.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2017

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2017 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad