All about teacher contracts

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Dan Haley

Editor and Publisher

December is here. While the rest of us are intently, hopefully, even happily, turning toward the holidays, something very important is underway at two of our local public school districts. 

Both the District 97 elementary schools and District 200 OPRF High School are prepping for critical teacher contract negotiations. We're betting the teacher unions at both districts are also prepping. 

Talked Monday to the school board presidents of both districts. 

Jackie Moore of OPRF said the road ahead will be clearer next week after the board and administration meet to finalize both logistics of negotiations, such as who is on the negotiating team, and identifying "primary areas of interest" to be addressed in the contract talks. In a fresh move, Moore and another board member were recently invited to a meeting of the Faculty Senate, the teachers' union. That's good.

At the public elementary schools, Holly Spurlock is enthused about a new process the board and the faculty will adopt this time around. Called "interest-based bargaining," the plan is to include a third-party facilitator from the start of the talks. Both the district and the Oak Park Teachers Association, the union, are being jointly trained this month on the new process. The two sides — or perhaps that is too harsh a characterization; Spurlock called them "teacher partners" — are also preparing a batch of one-sentence talking points they want broached in the discussions. Regulars here know my view that hiring a superintendent is far and away the most important job of any school board. And both of these districts have made a hire recently. 

So now we're at the second most important thing a school board does — crafting a contract with the teachers. It's critical not just because paying teachers is far and away the largest cost in any school district. And in a town that just passed one district's tax hike referendum while turning away the others, we know, rightly, there is sensitivity to pay raises.

Both these districts have a history of dishing out entirely too generous salary hikes. Those instincts have moderated some over the past couple of contracts as tax tension has risen from simmer to slow boil and as we've endured a major recession together. 

In recent elections, voters in Oak Park have effectively chosen school boards fully focused on equity in education. Those boards have hired superintendents as immersed in equity issues as they are, and they've adopted strategic plans that talk non-stop about equity.

Now it's time to align the faculty contract and the philosophy of evaluating and compensating teachers with equity initiatives. The status quo of lock-step raises, additional semi-hidden raises poured into obsolete concepts such as "steps and lanes," which reward teacher endurance more than innovation, does not accomplish that. 

Last time out, D97 and its "teacher partners" broke some glass in negotiating a new contract. A sincere effort to craft a way to evaluate teacher performance was created. New levels of promotion opportunities for teachers were created with worthy compensation attached. This was a way to honor and make use of the talent of great teachers while not shifting them out of classrooms into low-rung bureaucratic positions just to make more money. And the increasingly disputed notion of paying teachers more for piling up post-graduate hours was, at least, cracked. I'd give that contract a strong "B."

The high school meanwhile was stuck in place four years ago with a contract that could have been written in 1976. Innovative it was not. Reflective of a need for new thinking and bold approaches it was not. A flat-out "F."

I'm starting the clock. Both these districts claim they are ready and past ready to make change real. The aspirations are genuine. But the rocket fuel will be in these new contracts. Or not. 

Contact:
Email: dhaley@wjinc.com Twitter: @OPEditor

Reader Comments

2 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Kevin Peppard  

Posted: December 6th, 2017 5:05 PM

Dan: Here's another reason the numbers may not add up at OPRFHS. Superintendent Joylynn Pruitt-Adams is required to pass a licensure test to remain a Superintendent in Illinois. Part of that licensing includes a test of proficiency in mathematics. She failed, and will have to retake it. I don't make this stuff up. It's in an email from Karin Sullivan, the PR person, who's going into damage control mode. If this is the Test of Academic Proficiency (TAP) given to undergraduates at the sophomore level, before being allowed to pursue education degrees, it's written at the level of a high school junior, multiple choice, and only a 70% correct score is needed to pass. Check out the Illinois State Board of Education's website. Maybe she can sit in on a junior-level math class at her own school.

Kevin Peppard  

Posted: December 6th, 2017 4:31 PM

Dan: The way to start to analyse this is to compare compensation growth in D200, D97, and D90 to other districts, The U.S. Department of Education publishes a yearly report, "Projections of Education Statistics". which includes the growth rate in cost per student, deflated by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). It measures all 14,000 public school districts across the country., and gives 13 years of history, with a time lag. Much of "cost per student" is related to teacher's COMPENSATION. It doesn't matter if salaries are reined in to reality, if HEALTH CARE BENEFITS borne by the employer are allowed to skyrocket, as is happening at OPRFHS. Your own paper reported that family coverage now costs that district $26,000 per employee each year --that's the District's portion. Is there an incentive for the Chief Financial Officer to advise on this? He gets the same health care plan as the Faculty.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2017

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2017 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Latest Comments