Forget D97 at village hall, what about Harrison St.?

Opinion: Dan Haley

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Dan Haley

Editor and Publisher

Galen Gockel, the former village trustee, former District 97 school board member, and all-around sage counsel, said it well on Saturday morning as the school board and village board met with some 50 citizens on the topic of building a new school board HQ on the parking lot at village hall.

The current D97 headquarters is a wreck and has to be replaced, said Gockel, who as a school board member 40 years ago put the school district into the building at 970 Madison St. And, he said, whatever the virtues of building at village hall, it is clearly unpopular with neighbors, and it's going to lead to an extended battle. Neither board needs to spend its goodwill and political capital on such a fight, said Gockel.

Now Galen and his wife Marge know something about village buildings coming into residential neighborhoods as their first house in Oak Park sat on what is now the village hall parking lot. They and their neighbors sold and moved when Oak Park put its village hall on Madison Street in the 1970s.

My sense from listening and reporting on this is that D97 building at village hall will not happen and for just the reason Gockel stated. No one on the village board wants this fight. Village board members want to help D97 with a building using the Madison Street TIF. That means the new school building will be somewhere along Madison Street but not at village hall. 

Village board members want to focus on actual growth projects along Madison once they get the village's economic development apparatus realigned early in 2014. There is any number of opportunities for development, with key parcels on the street already owned by the village. On Monday, the board's economic development committee was also set to hear from two entities seeking financial incentives from the village to move or expand on Madison. Those would be Madison Street Theater (previously known as Village Players) and the grassroots Sugar Beet Co-op organic food project, which wants to open a store and seems to be eyeing Madison Street. Those are two projects worth serious consideration if we have finally moved past our fixation on spending TIF dollars only on fancy streetscaping.

Meanwhile, if the village board is looking for a place to focus its resources — development, inspections, marketing and the bully pulpit — it must turn actively to the Harrison Street Arts District. This vital area has suffered for decades as one family with ownership of six key properties at Harrison and Lombard has acted out a bizzaro scenario where some properties sat entirely empty while others actively decayed. A village government most often criticized for overreaching into the private market has proved utterly impotent over 30 years in confronting this blight, even as a nascent Arts District has somehow survived the rot at its core. 

Adding to the worries on Harrison is the news that La Majada, the pioneering Mexican restaurant on Harrison, has fallen into foreclosure. The foreclosure notice ran in last week's Journal.  

With all the Kleronomos properties already in foreclosure and LaMajada seemingly headed in that direction, what's the plan at village hall to directly and boldly find the opportunity in this pain?

So let's not fight over the D97 at village hall notion. Let's take the limited resources and do battle in the dark and blighted places where there is enormous upside.

Email: Twitter: @OPEditor

Reader Comments

8 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Gump,Forest Gump  

Posted: December 19th, 2013 5:46 AM

1010 lake street has 23,000 sq ft space available for rent: Plenty of parking available in surrounding area, try and sell d97 building before buying/building another. Good luck with that after telling everyone how much the building sucks and the fact that there is tons of long vacant building/spaces currently available on madison.


Posted: December 18th, 2013 8:45 PM

Biggest problem with Harrison Street becoming busy? Limited parking.

Bill from Oak Park  

Posted: December 18th, 2013 7:24 PM

Good comments dystOPia and Chris. While I respect Galen, he is wrong on this new building. The building can be re-modeled, but it looks (inside and out) to be in the same condition as the Elementary schools. Seems the WJ is in the bag for the new building and actively pushing it (and misleadingas a NIMBY issue (see Shrubtown) Well I live a block form North Ave and I don't want a new building. Maybe AC for the schools so our kids can learn something instead of sitting like Zombies in class.

Chris Williams from Oak Park  

Posted: December 18th, 2013 2:57 PM

Right on Dystopia, right on. Exactly. I recently reviewed the TIF law as well. This is why it frustrates me when people perceive the issue as a NIMBY issue - it's so, so much more than that.

Chris Williams from Oak Park   

Posted: December 18th, 2013 2:24 PM

Excellent analysis here Dan. I agree that Galen Gockel's comments were the most salient and powerful on Saturday. He has huge credibility. All your other points are right on as well. Although I do think that any piece involving the D97 building should mention that it could have only happened on the Village Hall lot if there was underground parking, which is a uniquely unfeasible and downright scary concept, especially for a residential district.

dystOPia from OP  

Posted: December 18th, 2013 12:25 PM

Any TIF funding related to a new D97 admin bldg is contrary to the Illinois TIF Act, which states; "... to remove and alleviate adverse conditions, it is necessary to encourage private investment and restore and enhance the tax base of the taxing districts in such areas by the development or redevelopment of project areas." TIF funds are only for private redevelopment that would not occur without ("but for") w/o such funding. How does a new D97 bldg. at any location comply with the IL TIF Act?

John Butch Murtagh from Oak Park, Illinois  

Posted: December 18th, 2013 10:58 AM

The D97 game is to get its hands on TIF money to solve a problem it has ignored from years. Ethical? Nah!

dystOPia from OP  

Posted: December 18th, 2013 10:26 AM

"The current D97 headquarters is a wreck and has to be replaced" is an assumption Galen Gockel, and now Dan Haley, is making apparently without benefit of reading the Building Assessment Report or touring the building itself. Nor is it based on a Space Needs Analysis, which was listed in the public meeting agenda last Sat. but not provided. Like all buildings in time, the admin bldg. simply needs to replace the HVAC and interior finishes, both items hardly cause for a new replacement building.

Facebook Connect

Answer Book 2017

To view the full print edition of the Wednesday Journal 2017 Answer Book, please click here.

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Oak Park and River Forest.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad